Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

DUMPING STORE NOT A FACTORY.

A fIIRISTCIIURCH DECISION. | Or TSLEGR.ini.— PKE.JS A3SOCMTIOM ] CHRISTCHUBCH, 4ih I-Vbiuaij. At the Magistrate's Court liih irwnini; I ili;. IT. \T. Bishop, S.M., t Mve ie«r,eH luclivmeut in ihe case Inspector of tfnc- i tones v. the manager of t!ip New Zoa- | land Shipping Compniu Tin.- <iue.-fion I was whotlier tho top.patiy's L> Holloa ' store, in which dumping was e«u'i-iail on ! chould bo registered as a factory. ' Tlk- . contention , of the prosecution -!mi3 th;:r ' "dumping" war, "packing," and' that jf i pnekmg for transit v;as done by mechauicul power in, the . building tba placo bhoul'l bo rpgiljf.'M'Pd as a fhciorV. T)io n<aiTMr?(o docidoil n,','aiu-t tbi-, "nnd (!u-mi'-=-oU ilio on <c.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19080205.2.43

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LXXV, Issue 30, 5 February 1908, Page 4

Word Count
114

DUMPING STORE NOT A FACTORY. Evening Post, Volume LXXV, Issue 30, 5 February 1908, Page 4

DUMPING STORE NOT A FACTORY. Evening Post, Volume LXXV, Issue 30, 5 February 1908, Page 4