COMMONWEALTH.
The figures presented to the House of S6presentativ.es by Sir William Lyne (fays the^ Sydney Telegraph) throw an _ ominous ,, light upon the financial course that the Federal Government is now shaping. In 1902-3 the Commonwealth feturncd £8,204,563 to tha States out of * total revenue of £12,105,937, but this year out of £13,745,200 it only proposes to give them £7,779,2C0. If tha States .received back the same proportion of their money now as they did four years , £50, thay would get £9,843,829, which .$, oyer £2,000,000 more' than the present Budget allots, thqm.' Mr. -Kideion, the Premier of Queensland,, in .his speech on the Financial Statement, ; spoke of the financial relations between the Commonwealth and the State. He said: — .At the conference . held, in Melbourne in October last year « general- resolution was agreed to em- • Bodying a principle which, I think, is Wsehtial" to ' tho satisfactory settlement of this important and difficult question, ' aairiely, '{hat any s'chenie should provide for 1 '^a) i- Giving financial, security to 'States': (bj leaving the Commonwealth intl the several Stales financially independent, each within its own sphere." In my opinion this is certainly the ideal ■we should seek to attain. Nor do I believe that any settlement will be satisfactory or- final, that fails to realise this ideal. The Melbourne conference also adopted_ Sir John Forrest's proposals concerning the proportion of Custom^ and "Excise 'Yevenue lo bo paid to the States after' 1910, ' with the important 'amendment fi that a new arrangement fho'uld ho embodied in the constitution, and should not be . revocable at will of ■ th'e Federal Parliament after 1920, as Sir "John proposed. Another conference was. 'held in 'Brisbane in May last, at which Sir John. Forrest, speaking on ■bshalf -of the Federal Government, stated ho could not agree to an amendment of his proposals 'as adopted by the State representatives at Melbourne. This statement by 'the Federal Treasurer induced -tha majority of State representatives >to withdraw (heir amendment, although thiy still beliaved that ths amendment 'was - accessary to secure the - -financial independence of the States, ..'jftid ,tbdy only agreed to surrender tho gorn.tr in tha hope that their acceptance 0/ the. -Federal proposals would ensure a , KtUejnent..of tho question. As Mr. J. M t Davies "I think a settlement upon the lass satisfactory basis would bi .better than no settlement at all." For my own part, I did not agree with this -contention. I' felt strongly that it ..was our d,i\ty to tho Slates we repre.■enied.tp abide by the resolution arrived _%t in Melbourne on this point. • t "As events have turned out," Mr. - ttCukt-on continued, "this important con..ce/SSJbrL, has ha,d no effect whatever in ; indncing ths Federal' Government to agree to the settlement, for Sir William ~~ 'Cyne, in his Budget speech on 18th ' August last, stated that such an arrangement, however desirable to ths States, be quite impossible in -/iew of 55» public expenditure, which must be carried jut by the Commonwealth. There are, as' everyone recognises, inhoierit difficulties iv the way of satisfactory 1 "fcfettlciuent- of this question, but ■These difficulties becomo impossibilities * when- wo have one Federal Treasurer on bshalf "of tha Federal Government agreeilijjf with ths Stats representative, and .'•Vss than three months aftbrwards anli3th»r Federal Treasurer repudiating tbo whols arrasgannnt. Such a measuro -of protection as the States now enjoy under the Braddon esction may terminate? at the' clo3e of 1910, and unless ' .some settlement of this question can be ' arrived at before that time, we shall •^fion bo entirely at the mercy of the .Federal. Parliasipnt as to whether any, _*nd, if any, what proportion of our -• Cuntoms and Ezcise revenue will be - tvyoilibls for State purposes. " - "._ What (askp the Argus) has brought ' Mr. Watson, leader of tha Federal Labour party, back into the paths of - moderation and commorusense ? This is the question every Student of politics wili ask after reading the address of the hon. member at the bazaar of the Political Labour League. Certainly the I&Lt. Wat-son who spoke there is not the Mr". Watson we hive known before. It t $& not the Mr, Watson who declared at .'the Labour Conference held in Sydney r£hat,tfl be. a socialist should be a sine for everyone who joined- the -vaults ' of tfia Labour .party. We know "110 actual Tsxand of socialism so mild, so , fl ip^:e,3piyely watered down, as that which - tie expounded' on Saturday. It cannot (says the Argus) be Fabian socialism, for that society avow- ' 'e/lly "aims at the reoorganisation of - 'society by the emancipation of land and industrial "'capital from individual and "* dr^sfoWnersJiip, and the vesting of them '■'ir'th© community for the general bene- •*-' fit-.-" -It is not the socialism of the English' Labour party. It h certainly not ""7 tire socialism -of the Political Labour '- ; Ife*gue, unctep whose auspices the ad- ' 'dfa^'was delivered; for that body submitted 'to the" last federal Labour Conferen.ee the objective — "It is the object _. p£..the Australian labour organisations to obtain control of all the means of production, distribution, and exchange." ' These things all mean a revolution, going down, to the very roots of society^ iind a cEange"~bf the whole basis upon j>rogi|e^s baa up to the present •^oeeir -made, > " • ' " Bu& Mr. .Watson, (the Argus continues) is,, to-day against all these things. H» scoffed the idea that the members of t,tjier]t<abppr party are. revolutionists. He ' :-—'* Where they joined issue with fhpir extreme Socialist friends was that ', .'. they~re'fused to believe that while hu- , -," .ipjap nature remained as it was, and until ■the- natural process of enlightenment and civic 'education had advanced much f ur!',ther,,tban. jt had, no complete system of Pocjalism^.gquld do anything else but j ' break -down.*' This declaration, we ad- | mit at once, means, not revolution, but Involution. Jt relies for its ends upon the ordinary development of human na- ''. Cure and human society, and, in so far •$ it does that, it carries 'with it the asBent of al l who look forward hopefully to the progress of the race on the up.Ward path. What we have always de'aounced is the folly of those who assert >-.<'that the evolutionary process can be dis- „. jiensed with, and that society can bo transformed in a generation into somo- •. thing quite- different from what it is today. But the question remains : What fraa brought Mr. Watson on to our side?
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP19070928.2.108.1
Bibliographic details
Evening Post, Volume LXXIV, Issue 78, 28 September 1907, Page 12
Word Count
1,050COMMONWEALTH. Evening Post, Volume LXXIV, Issue 78, 28 September 1907, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Evening Post. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.