Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

A FORGED LETTER.

SO MR. JUSTICE EDWARDS SATS. Mr. Justice Edwards delivered judgment this morning in the divorce suit of Martin v. Martin, heard last week, in which the petitioner, Frederick Martin, plumber, sought a divorce from his wife on the ground of alleged misconduct with William Ridgeway,' of Carterton. His Honour in the course of his judgment expressed the opinion that the letter which the petitioner had produced as having been written by his wife— in which she apparently admitted her misconduct, but asked to be taken back — was a forgery. He dismissed the suit, allowing £25 and disbursements as costs to the respondent, and £10 to the co-respondent Ridgeway. The letters produced in Court were ordered' to be impounded.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/EP18961209.2.64

Bibliographic details

Evening Post, Volume LII, Issue 1170, 9 December 1896, Page 6

Word Count
121

A FORGED LETTER. Evening Post, Volume LII, Issue 1170, 9 December 1896, Page 6

A FORGED LETTER. Evening Post, Volume LII, Issue 1170, 9 December 1896, Page 6