Waipawa R.M. Court.

Daily Telegraph (Napier), Issue 5427, 17 January 1889, Page 2

Waipawa R.M. Court.

WAIPAWA, ICtm JANUARY.

(Before G. A. Proece, Esq., R.M., and Mr.

S. Johnson, J.P.)

[OWS COBRIiSPONOKNT.j

John Twoley with charged with trespassing on the property of Mr John Harding, and neglecting to leave when requested to do so. Mr Loughnan for the defence. It appeared that defendant's father keeps some thirty head of cattle on the Tuki Tuki river bed, where it forms part of the Mount Vernon estate, instead of acquiring property of his own. Mr Harding proved the ease. Fined Is, with 7e costs, or in default three hours' imprison-

ment. Thomas Wilson was charged with being drunk in a public place, resisting tho police in the execution of their duty, and using obscene language. He was iinod os and costs or 4S liours on the first charge, 14 days with hard labor on the second charge, and a month with hard labor on the third, the sentences to run concurrently. William Neill was charged with being drunk, and was dismissed with a caution, crvii. cases. J. M. Dick v. E. M. Symons, judgment summons, .Co Bs. No appearance. Balance 365, with costs 18s, expenses Bs, to bo paid forthwith, or seven clays in Napier gaol. Samo v. Andrew Tuhua, judgment summons, £7 2s Od. No appearance. To bo paid with costs 18s, expenses Bs, by 31st January, or ten days' gaol. G. Abrahams v. F. W. Butler, judgment summons, £2 -Is 2d. No appearance. To be paid, with costs ss, expenses las, by 31st January, or seven days' gaol. McLean and Scott v. Terarua Hui Hui, claim loslld. Mr. Loughnan for plaintiffs, and Mr. Cresswoll for defence. Nonsuited, with defendant's expenses 10s, solicitor 10s Od. McLean and Scott v. Tuhcre, claim 13s lOd. Nonsuited with costs as above. Same v. Puhi Tukuriri, claim £5 15s Id. Nonsuited aa above. Samo v. Hanui Paikea, claim £3 Os 1 Id. Nonsuited us above. Same v. Tutoro Pouatahuri, claim £2 17s 7d. Nonsuited as above. Waipawa County Council v. E. Erickseu, claim 10s 2d. Judgment for os Id, with lis costs. Same v. W. Howes, oluini 12s (id. Judgment for Gs 3d, with Gs costs. Samo v. Edward Kenqi, claim £2 o's -id. Judgment for £1 3s 2d, with 14s costs. Same v. Elijah Kemp, claim £1 7s Gd. Judgment for 13s Od, with lis costs. Sumo v. W. Parsons, claim 18s lOd. Judgment for !'t.s 5d with 7s costs. Same v. E. Walker, claim £3 17s 7d. Judgment for £1 IGi lid, with 6s costs.

Samo v. J. F. Wells, claim £2 8s lOd. Judgment for £1 Is lid, with Gs costs. Mr Loughnan for plaintiffs in above cases. J. F. Crowe v. Joe Karaitiana, ulaim £2 Is od. Judgment for plaintiff, with 14s costs. Mr Cresswell for plaintiff. Samo v. Horekaßameka, clahn£l4l7s3d. For plaintiff, with 24s costs, witness 2s 9d. Solicitor (Mr Crew well) 21s. Same v. T. Nesbitt, claim £0 17s. For plaintiff, with costs lis, witnessss, solicitor 21s.

James Brown v. A. J. Cmwford, claim £50 10s 8d on P.N. For plaintifl, with costs-lis, witness, 9s Id; solicitor, 31s Gd. Mr Crosswell for plaintiff, Mr Loughnan for defendant.

Samo v. samo, claim Col IGs Bd, on P.N. For plaintiff, with lis costs, witness 9s, solicitor 3ls 6d.

Irak Reupena v. Joseph Roberts, claim £5. For plaintiff, with 31s costs, expenses 255, witness 10s, solicitor 21s. Mr Loughnan for plaintiff.

C. Hensen v. H. Jensen, claim £100. For plaintiff for £74 10s, with 45s costs, solicitor £3 3s. Mr Loughnuu for plaintiff and Mr Purchas for defendant. '

J. Palmer v. Piui Pane, claim £G lis. For plaintiff, with 10s costs, exponses Is Gd solicitor (Mr Loughnan) 21s. ' Jeanette McDougall v. Mrs E. Gilmour, claim £1 18s. Judgment for Ss, with costs His, solicitor 10s Gd. The claim was for a railway ticket to Wellington, and 8s advanced in Wellington. The Bench said the Ss should have been paid into Court, and they believed the ticket was a present. MiGould for plaintiff, and Mr. Loughnan for defendant.

A. Robertson v. J. Titers, judgmoi'.'c summons, £7 12s -Id. To be paidj with 28s costs, witness os, by loth June, or 14. days gaol. J

This was tho heaviest cause list known in this Court, but of 07 cases there wore 7 judgment summonses and 33 rate oases ■ 23 cases were settled, 1 eoufeased, 1 withdrawn, S adjourned, and 9 not served