"MORE-PORK."
To the Editor of th» Dailt Southmut Caoss. Sib.—l Quite agree with "Australian" as to the ; value of the more-pork in destroying insects; buffo he is mistaken if he thinks that the Australian more- 1 pork is the same as the New Zealand bird called by . that name. The New Zealand more-pork is an owl? (Athene Nova-Zelandiae), while the Australian more- * pork (Podargus humeralis) and the little more-pork (iEgotheles Novse-Hollandiae) both belong to the night-jar or goat-sucker family, which are infinitely more Y&luable as insect-destroyera than the owls. i I must, however, differ from him as to the value of introducing the laughing jackasg or great belted kingfisher into these islands. I am afraid- that it would do more harm, by killing the lizards, than it would do good by destroying insects.—l am, &c, F. W, Huttoit. Epsom, April 3, 1867.
To the Editor of the Daily Southern Cross. . Mr. Editor,— l think I can give your correspondent! s " More-pork" the information he wants. I hare, at , this moment, a more-pork in a cage, and I feed him with raw meat, which he devours, with apparent i satisfaction. I think I can give a tolerable strong , proof that these birds are birds of prey, having sten one of them seize a canary-bird of ours which liad - escaped from its cage, and which we were on the- , point of catching, when a morC-pork swept suddenly down upon it and carried it off j and upon another occasion one flew ii>to our verandah at dusk, and attempted to take anottier" canary out of its cage,*, before our eyes. I think this is proof sufficient thai^ these birds are birds of, prey.— T am,^&c, , -• 1 ~> '''- • ' '* THIRTBEff. $, Hawthofnden, H6wick, April' 3, 1867. .. * p/S. I waß about to send this ty> the post ypster. *' day, when your paper came with another letteir^in ifc: io"n"the subject in question, signed " Australian.^^ I can only say— if the writer, makes no .mistake in-^ bh '.assertions— that his more-porß cannot be th©^ same bird as my more-pork. The bird which I have>>j ralwfys heard called the more-pori^ in New Zealand^ (an*d I have been here nine years) is a small kind of owl of a brown colour. We have plenty of them ia fe our garden, and hear them often talking to each other about a further allowance of pork all night. Perhaps, there ate two kinds of owls called morepork, aod that they are of different habits. If so, I should like to know it, and perhaps your correaI pondent "Australian" can tell me.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DSC18670406.2.23.6
Bibliographic details
Daily Southern Cross, Volume XXIII, Issue 3025, 6 April 1867, Page 5
Word Count
427"MORE-PORK." Daily Southern Cross, Volume XXIII, Issue 3025, 6 April 1867, Page 5
Using This Item
No known copyright (New Zealand)
To the best of the National Library of New Zealand’s knowledge, under New Zealand law, there is no copyright in this item in New Zealand.
You can copy this item, share it, and post it on a blog or website. It can be modified, remixed and built upon. It can be used commercially. If reproducing this item, it is helpful to include the source.
For further information please refer to the Copyright guide.