THE PEIHO AFFAIR.

Daily Southern Cross, Volume XVII, Issue 1285, 6 January 1860, Page 1

THE PEIHO AFFAIR.

Captain Longley, whd was wounded in the action at the mouth of the Peiho, made the following remarks on Thursday, the 6th inst., at a meeting at Bishop's Auckland, where he ha* beenreceived with enthusiasm, and presented with an address of congratulation upon his return :—: — "I have returned home from a distant pare of the globe, having been tent some two years ago to India, and thence to China, where I was present during the recent engagement. We waited at Canton the arrival of the English plenipotentiary, Mr. Bruce, and from Canton we had to proceed with that gentleman and the French Consul to Pekin, to ratify the treaties. When we approached the river we found the forts had been rebuilt which the year before had been destroyed The entrance up the river was likewise blockaded. The ambassadors then consulted Admiral Hope, and placed the matter in his hands, and he reiolved upon forcing the passage. I landed a party of ten men from one of the gunboats, as skirmishers. Whilst I was in the act of leading the men on towards the embrasures I was unfortunately wounded. If the Chinese had opened out the whole of their batteries Ido not think a single gunboat would have escaped. On the 24th the Chinese fired one gun to warn us to keep off, and waited for us to draw off our forces, and it was 'on our part the declaration of war was made. There was no treachery in the caie at all. We taw the masks in the embrasures, and we knew by that there were guns as well. And so far as treachery was concerned I hope we will hear no more about it. I might alto remark with regard to the policy of forcing our civilisation on the Chinese. It appears to me to be this. If an old crusty man was living alone in a house in Auckland, and wished to live by himself, and perfectly independent, and all you gentlemen now present went and said, 'We wish to speak to you ; we will not allow you to stop alone ; you must become civilised ;' would he not be perfectly right in defending his house ? (Applause.) This is the case with regard to the Chinese affair. In England every man's house is his castle, and the same regard 'ought to be paid to the Chinese. With all due regard to the immense trade we have with the Chinese, I do not think we are justified in forcing our civilisation upon them. I had it from Lord Elgin himself that the further he went into the country, and had intercourse with the people the better they received him and the better they liked us. In Canton we have traded with the natives for a long time, yet still they do not speak well of us, as if justice had not been done to them."

A Fbbnoh Opinion of the Great Eastern. — A. French agent, who was stated to be a distinguished naval officer, pre-eminent for hi» nautical knowledge and experience, bears testimony, ioVa letter published in Wednesday's "Moniteur," to the enormous strength and indubitable safety of the Great Eastern, and to her victory over the ocean. With regard to the first point, the naval officer says : — "Nevertheless, it may be said that the destruction of the forward funnel of the Great Eastern might have'happened to the smallest steamer, and would probably have occasioned its total destruction, because it would not have presented the mass aud solidity of the great ship, while the accident in question in nowise compomrises the future of this lsst." With respect to the second point, the same authority say*: —"The little swell, while going 'Against a .strong headwind, and a heavy sea on,' proved that the nautical problem ha* be*n tolved (the italics are his own) If there be any doubts, they can only be ai to herrolling, because she experienced no slanting heavy seas, and the vessel was too light to be considered in hernormal position. Butwhen, with , the wind' rigtiiishead, she oscillated up- and down hardly a quarter of a degree, while the neighbouring 'vessels plunged into the waves, and her sharp bows threw up less sp^ay than a boat, one feels, convinced : that no' sea can stop her, and that she will out ' through the waves with too great a force and facility for them to retard her progress', or for them even to produce th»t pitching which ii lojncoavenient to, psj.

sengen. Contrarywiie to 10 many ships of rounded lines, whioh the sea toiiei and retards more than, does the wind, the Great Eastern meets with no impediment from the waves. She cuts them too easily to fee) their rapid motion;, the wind appears the only obstacle which nature oan present ; anJ all who are acquainted with navigation know how slight its action is in comparison with the notion of the waves. Thus the trial which has just been made proves that this gigantic mass will always overpower the sea, and that she will not feel even the effects thereof except when the waves strike her sideways. But then again, the weight of the vessel and her length will diminish her motion, as was 'proved during tht voyage, when, from the .breaking of some part of her steering gear, she was thrown into a position to present her broadside to the sea."— Timts. Lauquadlb Inoidknt.— We have heard of a very laughable incident which recently occurred in Limeriok, A gentleman, who belongs to the society of Freemasons, had for a long, period been pestered by a friend to communicate to him the secret by which members of that confraternity recognise eaon other. For a long time he resisted ; but at length he informed his tormentor that the sign of recognition was made by placing the thumb of the right hand to the nose, and moving the fingers up and (town as if playing on an imaginary cornopean. The letter's prurient curiosity was satisfied, and a few days after as he was standing with a lady in the Limerick terminus, he was pointed out a gentleman, who, he was told, was a Freemason. Determined to utilise his knowledge of the mysterious art, he placed himself in the gentleman's way, and, as he passed him by, he made the sign of recognition, as explained by his friend. The individual so saluted stood for a moment, and conceiving that thejamsteur's objection placing his thumb to his nose was to insult him, raised his cano and was about to thrash him, when the object of his hostility apologised, and saying that he took him for a Freemason, walked away amidst shouts of laughter.— "Limerick, Tipperary, and Waterford Examiner. The Diminution of rain.— The following remarks on the cause and consequences of the diminution of rain in all countries are by M, A. Donibinsky, professor of chemistry :—"lt: — "It is demonstrated that during the last eight year* an increase of rising tracts of land has taken place, and that the majority of rivers recede to much lower beds, losing a great amount of their usual volume of water, and raise an abundance of fossils and weeds, who soon form layers for dry land, and increase the solid matter of the globe. The same effect is caused by the increase of population and the progress of science and arts, by the decay or refuse of matter. Large forests are consumed by the great demand for the erection of habitations, ship building, domestic and agricultural employments, and industry, by which means the reflection of light must increase, and thereby a smaller amount of evaporation or humidify must be caused, and in consequence a less amount of rain is produced, so that the formation of land is favoured. The phenomenon of the Nile in Egypt not having overflowed during the last month of June, and the coast area of the Baltic having receded for about a quarter of * mile, and limilar events visible in all rivers, substantiate the fact. We come now to the question, what results and consequences emanate from it 1 And as far as human calulation permits, we find already striking proofs in the great change of climatic condition, the increase of heat, and a great amount of atmospheric electricity, producing virulent diseases, the prevalent affliction* 6i the respiratory organs, the uncommon emigration of animals and fishes from distant climates, the frequent boreal reflection of the sun, and several other indications which would require volumes to describe. One universal blessing however will ensue ; and that will be the disappearance of the potatoe disease., All bulbous plants, if for many years reproduced by bulbs, and not by the cultivation of seeds, lose a great deal of their saccharine and floury substance, and incline to on unhealthy fermentation of the juice in the plants, which, during the continuant nun, attract certain atmospheric? animalcules, and which penetrate into the plants, to metamorphose, and thus produce an almost invisible maggot, which, at its maturity, descends from the stalk into the bulbs, and causes the potato disease. If, during an interval of dry and hot weather, 'the fermentation referred to is prevented, the disease will surely disappear. This result has been established on the continent, where sandy soil is prevalent, principally in Mark Brandenburg, in Prussia, where, by order of the government, extensive trials were instituted and prodnced the said effect. Agriculturalists ought to improve the cultivation of potatoes by the seeds, and their products in the third season would confirm my assertion."

Auckland, 12th Nov., 1859. Sir, — I have the honour to state that I have applied, as late Candidate at the City Election, to the Returning Officer for permission to inspect the Poll Book*. The Returning Officer informed me that he had no authority to open them : I asked, by what authority did he keep them closed, but obtained no answer. As I conceive the Poll Books to be public property, and as luspicion is certain to arise, with or without cause, among voters who, debarred from the satisfaction of ascertaining that their votes have been correctly entered, (the presence of agents in the booths being insufficient security, for reason* which I am prepared to give, if required,) and as there appears to be a doubt whether the Poll Books are accessible to the public, I have the honour to request that the General Government will take such steps in the matter as may be deemed advisable towards removing the doubt, ,»nd that I may be informed of the result. I have, &c, Hugh Cableton, M.P.C. The Hon, Colonial Secretary.

Colonial Secretary's Office, Auckland, 7th Dec, 1859. Sir, — I am directed by Mr. Stafford to acknowledg 0 the receipt of your letter of the 13th ultimo, with reference to the inspection of the Poll Books after an election, and, in reply, to encloie for your information a copy of & circular on this subject which has been addressed to Returning Officers. I have the honor to be, Sir, Your very obedient servant, W. 'ferISBOBNJ!, Under Secretary. Hugh Carleton, Esq., M.P.C., Auckland.

[COPT.] Circular. Colonial Secretary's Office, p Auckland, 7th Dec, 1859. Sir, — A question having been raised as to whether the Pell Books after an election are open to inspection, I am directed by Mr. Stafford to inform you that the Electoral Laws of New Zealand do not provide for suoh inspection. It would, however, be in entire accordance with the «pirit and intention of those laws to allow a proper inspection of the Poll Books, and to furnish copies of all or any part oE those Book* to persons requiring either, on payment of a reasonable charge for the same. The English Electoral Law provides that the officer who has the custody of Poll Book* "shall deliver to any party applying for the same an office copy of all or any part ofjsuoh Poll Books, on payment of a reasonable charge for writing the same, and also shall permit any party to inspect such Poll Books." » I am therefore to suggest to you the propriety, pending the decision of the Legislature, of pursuing a similar course : two shillings and sixpence being oharged ', for each inspection, and sixpence for each folio of | ninety words of office copies ; and the fees being retained by you to cover the necessary trouble and expense. I have, &0., I W. GISBOBNU, j Under Secretary.

A List of Pewoni who voted at the election of two members to servo in the Provincial Cotraoil of the Province of Auckland for the Electoral District of the City of Auckland. ,

i 3 Namh op Elkciob. I 5] John Bridgeman 0 William Bracey ..; 0 John, Cox. 1 ... 0 Jerome Cadman ............ ' 0 JohnDingjrall. ...t tfsi PhilipCallan Jqfinßolton „,......,0 0 Jno. B»tger '. „..'. 0 Thomas Douglas ;..... 0 Jertmiah-CMsy. .. M .... ...< 0 \ < rt > . o B s "I 0 0 »■ •■• 0 , • ':; -'

Name op Elkotob, | Bruno L. Hamel . . „.,,... John Shore Hawkins 0 Michael Haydon Thomas Kelly 0 Samuel Jonkers 0 Patrick Harkin Angelo Elias 4 0 Henry Keesing, junr ,0 Wm. v Harrison ,\ . , , Thomas Harrold 0 Henry Hurfit F. Gardner John Hay ward Henry Ellis Thomas Heath . Samuel Jackson John Goodwin John Hooker 0 Benjamin Holmes John Graham 0 Eobert Gibson William Goodfellow 0 Ealph Keesing 0 William Fleming 0 David Kell 0 Thomas George John Guilding J. Harp Samuel J. Edmonds 0 Michael Heath 0 Thomas James Jaggar Henry Gilfillan Alexander Fleming 0 Nathan Henry , Richard Gillham Daniel Gough James Higgins Charles Ewen Harkness Hamilton James Ferguson John Hannah 0 John Guilding George Gerrish Andrew Johnston Thomas Jeffery * Timothy Gibbs M. F. Hanlen 0 Henry Keesing 0 Abraham Keesing 0 Charles Joseph Findlow Donald Ferguson Patrick Gorman 0 Thomas Florance 0 John Holt 0 John Hosking Geo. Gallagher 0 Thomas Henderson 0 Thomas Gleeson 0 Josiah Clifton Firth Ferigal Gallagher L. D. Halsteacl 0 Richard Goldfinch James Kelly Eobert Fielder 0 John Hendon George Gimbel 0 John Grundy Michael Keiley John Fair Eobert Horsley 0 Jeremiah Hurley John Flanagan 0 Philip Herepath James Green .* John Innis 0 James Gibson Eobt. Evans John Finlay 0 Walter K. Graham Thomas Holmes Geo. S. Porter 0 W. Lepine W. B. Montgomery A. McPherson 0 George McKinley Alexander S. Martin 0 Alexander Marshall 0 John Matheson 0 Hemy Lawson Kenneth McKenzie 0 Frederick L. Prime Bernard McDonald John Makepeace Eobert Pollock 0 Peter McArthur 0 John Patterson 0 James Lee 0 John Charles McDowell John Mason Thomas Mooie Philson Peter Paiker 0 Edm. Powell Chailes Madden William Purdy James McNalty H. Partington 0 William Phillips Timothy Lynch T. W. Marsh . 0 Wm. Morrin 0 Geo. McElwain D. Pollen Eobert Pivott John Nicholson 0 James McLeod 0 Jas. Molloy Wm. McGarvey 0 John Porter G. B. Owen Aitchinson Oliver Daniel Munro Edmund Mahoney Alexander Mackie Alex, Neilson William Mearg Thomas McGuire Thomas Millar 0 Henry Neale John Probert Joseph Osborne John McQuaters Wm. McCallum JohnC. Petley AllanO'Neill 0 John Mitchell 0 Philip Levy 0 Joseph Measures. ..l 0 William Pulham 0 John Phillips Thos. Lynch John McGinly. John Nolan 0 Fredk. W. Merriman Daniel Lynch' 00 Henry Potter 0 Samuel Marks 0 M. McCormack Q William McEwan 0 Alexander McDonald Robert Leslie 0 • John McNamara Ed. Matthews 0 John Moore , John McGrath Ephraim Mills W. Motion 0 George MoVay 0 Charles Lowson 0 George Leahy ...,,.... Pat. McMahon Daniel McClusky 0 James Eice Morgan 0 John McLeod o Vicesimus Lush Richd. Monk Daniel Lockwood 0 Jas. Lynch 0 John Nicholson 0 Samuel Morris 0 Richard Phillips BrienO'Hara 0 William Philcox Thomaa Murphy Stephen Letham] 0 Pat. Beirne , Saml.MilLi John William Lewis Thos. Murphy John Mintreu Willm. Lawrence 0 B. .Lewis . .,,'.. i . ..•.....,. Jai, Jno. Piercy ..i, ........ 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 00 0 00 00 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 .0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 * 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 0 0 t 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 00 0 0 0 >0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 • 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 o0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0, 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Name of Elector. q Wm. MoGuire ° Andrew Otto Michael Leahy .... Thos. North .' Antonio Martin 0 John Petman , , Patk. Lorigan- 0 JohnPettit 0 Robert Patterson 0 Alfred Marriage John Malcolm 0 Alex. C. P. Macdonald 0 Peter McDonald Richard Moore Jm. McHhaney Francis McMahon P. A. Phillips 0 Albert J. Nicholas 0 David Muir 0 Thomas Macready 0 A. Mears John Machonichie 0 A. Miller D. Lundon 0 R. 0. Macdonald John Leaning 0 J. Parkins James McKerras Francis Marriott Lachlan McLiver 0 Edward Mahony Patrick Mi11er...., 0 A. A. Melvin....' 0 Isaac McEwan 0 T. Macky James A. McLarnon 0 Jame» Mahony 0 Hugh Macky Joseph G. Percy "Walter McCanl 0 Samuel Vesty 0 Martin Tims Francis White John Williams . , , , , 0 George Wishart 0 Henry White James Sims 0 Thomas Wren 0 George Smallfield Robert Scott George "Vaile 0 Matthew Henry Roe Thomas Sanders 0 William Young Richard Ridings George Turner 0 Y. Walters Henry Russell Edward Bridges Walker .... Henry Ridings John Savory , W.B.Smith Robert Stuart 0 Benjamin E. Turner 0 Thomas Russell John Roskell Robert Shedden 0 Donald Sutherland 0 John Shields 0 James Taylor 0 W.C.Wilson William Swanson 0 Charles Sanders 0 John Rippon Vaile 0 Charles Robinson 0 Charles Winch John Richardson 0 Alexander Wright 0 Michael Wood George Wilson J. Williamson James Sullivan 0 John Watson Alexander Rodger 0 John Russell 0 Henry Whelch John West Reading Octavius Smalliield Archibald Somerville David Sheehan 0 diaries Southwell 0 John Seabrook William Rattray 0 Thomas Smith 0 James Young 0 Thomas Shove 0 Thomas Short 0 Richard Taylor John Ryle George Turrell 0 Benjamin Tonks Joseph Liston Wilson James Rutherford J.Wright 0 Charles Tothill 0 Thomas Somerville William Rattray 0 George Smith 0 James Welsh John Russell 0 Joseph Young Edward Rich 0 P.Robertson 0 T. Speechlay Andrew Somerville 0 , James Slade 0 John Watson 0 Robert Thompson 0 Laurence Tattersall Andrew Rooney James Haldane Watt 0 Titus Angus White Alexander Sims .... 0 Jno. Augt. Sakey ." 0 John Sauerbier George Strong Patk. Sullivan W. S. Wilson Robt. Tudehope 0 John Rattray 0 George Wright David Russell 0 Alfred Spalding Charles Henry Rose Johnßose Thomas Wyllie 0 James Webb Wm. Williams W. H. Smith , 0 Robert Ridling 0 Thomas Thompson Thomas S Sansom 0 Joseph Robley Edwin Tremain^ M. Somerville .'. John Shepherd 0. Stephenson , 0 John Adam Sims j,. 0 James R. Young '.. 0 James Terry 1 . ' Alexander WiUde 0 C. J. Stone James Williamson Samuel Teague 0 John Scott Daniel Sheehan 0 R. M. Rhodes «.... 0 Richard Tucker .*.... 0 G. Short «/... 0 Wm. J. Woods „.,. 0 George Webster 0 John Russell 0 John Walters Chas. Schafer^ 0 John Wilson 0 Thomas Rusdea Joseph Syms 0 Thoi. Giles Robbins 0 William Thorne ..„„. John Robertson .TO**... 0 Joseph Robinson 0 GeorgeSibbin 0 . James Spare 0 Patrick South 0 Edward Walsh ' Richard Rathbone Edward Reynolds ' Thomas Russell 0 William Rose W. Wardell William White Frederick Sims „,,. 0 i o 6 0 0 0 0 00 0 00 0 0 0 0. 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 * I 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 Y. 0 > 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0

Name of EijicTOß. 11^1 t a i J J a £ James Anderson 0 0 Nicholas Cpdd 0 0 Thomas Buddie ' 0 0 George Ansell 0 0 Charles Bruce 0 0 John Bolous o 0 John Casey o 0 Patrick Coyle 0 0 William Dempsey 0 0 Robert Bryant , o 0 J. Watson Bain „ o 0 Matthew Dillon 0 0 William Donald o o Hans Christopher i....... 0 0 David Arthur Q q Junes Doran o 0' Henry Day o 0 Patrick Dignan , o 0 John Buchanan o 0 Joseph Davis o 0 S. Browning o 0 Daniel Collins 0 0 Patrick Collins o 0 William A«hby 0 0 John Callnan o 0 Henry Cooper 0 0 Francis Coilway *„... 0 0 Thomas Burrows '""'". 0 Michael Dineen ". , " 0 Jno. H. Burntide 0 0 William Cooper „ 0 0 Thomas Canty „][ Q 0 Joseph Brennan , 0 0 Charles Brinley 0 0 Benjn. Butterwortti 0 0 William Culpan 0 0 James Thos. Boylan 0 William Coleman ........... 0 0 Robertßartley 0 0 Henry Dodd 0 0 Peter Collet 0 0 William-Campbell 0 0 William Britton 0 0 James Brame 0 0 Owen Connor 0 0 AsherAsher 0 0 Edward Brophy 0 0 George Boyd 0 0 Joseph M. Coghlan 0 0 Joseph Culpan 0 0 J. F. Clark 0 0 William Bacon 0 0 James William Carr 0 0 Alfred Boon 0 0 George Clements 0 0 Peter Connor 0 0 C.Day 0 0 Henry Coomer 0 0 William Baker 0 0 William C. Daldy ;.. 0 0 Jamei Allen 0 Frederick Danks 0 0 James Chapman „ 0 0 David Archibald 0 0 Thomas Brown 0 0 Henry Deßurgh Adams 0 0 Thomas Craig 0 0 David Burn 0 0 Richd. Collins 0 0 John Burdett 0 0 Wm. Alfred Curtis 0 0 W. Brier 0 Wm. Davies 0 0 A. Duthio 0 Adam Chisholm 0 0 Archibald Campbell ........ 0 0 E. J. Cox 0 Abel Barris 0 _^ 0 Andrew Craig 0 0 J. Dilworth 0 0 James Wilson Allan 0 0 Alexander Dingwall 0 0 John Cavanagh 0 John Cortesi 0 0 Joseph Coombe 0 0 A. Black 0 0 Jas. Boswell 0 0 James Bruce 0 0 James Cox j 0 James Dry 0 < 0 Elias Bowden 0 0 Arch. Clark 0 0 Friend Day 0 0 James Archibald 0 0 Henry Hopper Adams 0 0 Walter Coombes 0 0 James Caradus .' 0 Michael Dalton 0 0 William Cooper 0 0 Alfred Cook 0 0 Thomas W. Brown 0 John Coleman 0 0 T. Dove 0 0 Hugh Coolahan 0 0 John Conway 0 Patrick Bonfield 0 Timothy Duane 0 Saml. Davis 0 0 Daniel Buckley 0 0 John Brown 0 0 James Cullen 0 0 F. W. Dawson 0 0 William Conway 0 James Aggers 0 0 Patk. Coyle 0 0 James Bond 0 0 George Dickinson 0 0 James Bruce 0 Samuel Collins 0 Edward Barry 0 0 K. Andrews 0 0 Wm. Buchanan 0 0 Patrick Donovan 0 0 Thomas Burrows 0 0 N.B. — This person claims to have this vote register© on the ground that the previous rote was a personation Hugh Carleton 0 Stephen E. Hughes 0 0 James George , 0 0 William Griffin 0 0 William Griffith 0 0 Thos. Hyde 0 0 C. A. Harris 0 0 James Heron 0 0 George Edward Hunter 0 0 William Gamble 0 0 Arthur Fennell 0 0 George Bush Hair 0 0 E. Foley 0 0 Patrick Hevinagh 0 0 Henry Gilberd 0 0 Alfred Jones 0 0 William Kean 0 0 Samuel S. Forsaith 0 0 John Forster 0 0 John Henry 0 0 D. Evitt 0 0 Samuel Hodge 0 0 William Gorrie 0 0 John Gorrie 0 0 John Hoop 6 0 Wm. P. Kirkwood 0 0 Thomas Fagan 0 0 James Jones 0 0 Wm. Harrison , 0 0 John Glanders 0 I Benjamin Gittos 0 0 William Flowers .* 0 0 John Garty 0 0 James Henderson 0 0 Peter Grace 0 Andrew Hodge 0 0 James Keegan 0 0 Martin Holmes 0 0 Thomas S. Forsaith 0 0 Michael Kilfoyle » 0 0 Walter Granam tt 0 Charles Hills 0 0 William Foulner ... 0 0 Stannui Jones 0 Walter Ewen ,; 0 0 James Halyday 0 0 William'Jenningi 0 0 Michael Hurley 0 0 James Kennedy „.,.,...... 0 0 ! 8;H. Hamilton _„.*. 0 James Harris 0 0 Philip Kunst, 0 0 W. Joiner 0 0 Richard Grigg., 0 0 * James Francis 0 0 Geofgo Gnthiun „,,. 0 0