Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

INEQUALITIES FEARED

N.S.W. Company Taxes

The proposed new wartime company tax in Nev South Wales is viewed with considerable misgiving by busll^ s ? and manufacturers, who tear that it will be inequitable, and may place some companies in a difficult financial P The president of the Sydney Chamber of Commerce, Mr. A. E. Heath, said t a be had reviewed a number of specific instances of the operation of the tax, and thought that it might have disastrous effects on some companies, ltb ? u4 achieving its main object of checkins profiteering, because the circumstances and mode of operation ot companies differed widely. A company operating on a small margin of profit and a quick turnover might need onlv a relatively small amount ot capital and would be heavily penalized, whereas a company doing a different type of business, involving a heavy overhead, would normally show a lower ratio ot profits to capital, and might escape lightV lt was utterly wrong to take 4 per cent, on capital employed as the starting point for such a tax. Ibis was barely more than the return on Commonwealtn bonds, and' left no margin to compensate for business fluctuations am. losses. Many companies, he pointed out, were obli'-ed’ to pay more than 4 per cent, to holders of debentures or preference shares, and 6 per cent, had been taken as the fair standard of earnings for such enterprises as gas companies. No u° unt ry in the world had .carried such a “ e asuie below 6 per cent. Eight per cent, could be considered fair and reasonable, and the progression on earnings m excess thFs could be made steeper than the ex--ISt‘‘The should be suefi that while sufficient revenue is secured for the Com monwealth, a company s hnaneial position will not be jeopardized. he con C 1 An d 'illustration of the tax is afforded bv a large manufacturing company in Sydney, which would pay £6OOO under the present wartime company tax, but would pnv £27.000 under the new proposals. Under Mr. Fadden’s Budget.tins company would pay, m all, £3u,000 of Commonwealth taxation but MrC’hifley's plans will raise the amount to £57,800.

Marcus Clark & Co. Ordinary dividend payments are being resumed by Marcus Clark and Company, Limited with a rate of 3 per cent, tor the j ear ended August 2. This is the same rate as for 1937-38. No dividend was paid for the next, two years. Net profit of £56,051 is an increase of £0264, aitei providing for "greatly increased taxation ami £8485 for depreciation, against £8273 last year. First preference dividend of 6 per cent, amounts to ±lB,OOO, second preference of 6i per cent, to £19,360, and ordinary dividend to £12,’145.

Stock And Share indices (Bv Telegraph.— Press Assn.—Copyright.) LONDON, November 14. “Financial Times'’ stock and share indices, with previous quotations, are (October 15, 1926, equals 1060) Govt. Home Indus- Gold

sec’s. Rails trials mines. Peb. 4 .... 112.3 43.9 88.5 173.4 Mar 112.3 42.3 85.6 170.5 A pl. Mar 113.2 45.2 85.4 173.9 2 113.2 45.2 84.3 167.3 Jun. 113.1 45.1 87.4 170.0 July 2 .... 113.8 47.3 88.3 168.5 1 .... 113.5 49.0 93.3 171.8 Sept 113.6 52.4 96.7 176.2 Oct. i .”1 114.0 51.5 98.1 177.8 Nov. i.... 114.1 50.9 99.7 172.5 Nov. 114.0 50.8 100.2 175.0 Nov. 10 113.0 51.2 100.6 175.1 Nov. n .... 113.9 51.4 100.8, 175.0 Nov. 13 .... 113.9 51.5 101.1 1 75.4 Nov. 14 .... 113.9 51.5 101.5 176.3

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19411117.2.8.4

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 35, Issue 45, 17 November 1941, Page 3

Word Count
572

INEQUALITIES FEARED Dominion, Volume 35, Issue 45, 17 November 1941, Page 3

INEQUALITIES FEARED Dominion, Volume 35, Issue 45, 17 November 1941, Page 3