Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THEFT OF PAINT

For the theft from bis employers of two tins of paint valued at I</G, Clarence Mollier, a young married man, was convicted and'ordered to come "P for sentence within three ..mouths, when lie appeared in tile Magistrates Court, Wellington. yesterday. before Mr. Stout, S M His explanation when accosted in the act of taking the paint away, sain Senior-Sergeant G. .1. Paine, was that he wanted it for an aged couple. Mollier said he had wanted to do the couple a good turn. They had promised tn make him a fire-screen if lie could get some paint for the roof of their house. The magistrate: Il's all very well to be generous at somebody else s _ expense. Why didn’t you buy the paint? Mollier: 1 didn't have the money—l i only get £4/S/6 a week.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19410222.2.136

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 34, Issue 127, 22 February 1941, Page 13

Word Count
138

THEFT OF PAINT Dominion, Volume 34, Issue 127, 22 February 1941, Page 13

THEFT OF PAINT Dominion, Volume 34, Issue 127, 22 February 1941, Page 13