Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Electrocution Dangers

Sir, —In your issue of June 9 I have noticed “Aztec's” letter dealing with alleged dangers from the use of 230 volts. It would not be permissible in the space allowed in your columns to enter into a technical argument dealing with the various pros and cons of 230 versus 110, nor would the average user of electricity bo interested in same. I feel, however, that the sweeping statements made by “Aztec” cannot altogether be allowed to pass without comment. I would point out that 230 volts was the standard voltage for domestic use in Dunedin, Christchurch, and Auckland, before the Public Works Department were engaged in the major distribution of electricity in New Zealand, and also that 230 volts is standard with the National Grid System, that extends from one end of England to the other, so that if the Public Works Department really are “misguided,” they are b.v no means alone in their error. With regard to “Aztec’s” comments on increased fire risk, inquiries made from the Wellington Fire Brigade by no means bear out his statements, aud if he seriously considers that a reduction from 230 to 50 volts will decrease fire hazard, I can only assume his experience is as out-of-date as his nom de plume would indicate.—l am. etc., NELSON JONES. 'Wellington, June 10.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19330612.2.130.4

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 26, Issue 219, 12 June 1933, Page 11

Word Count
221

Electrocution Dangers Dominion, Volume 26, Issue 219, 12 June 1933, Page 11

Electrocution Dangers Dominion, Volume 26, Issue 219, 12 June 1933, Page 11