BUSY TIME AHEAD

Dominion, Volume 20, Issue 194, 14 May 1927, Page 13

BUSY TIME AHEAD

SUPREME COURT SITS NEXT WEEK MANY CIVIL AND DIVORCE CASES A busy period for Supremo Court officials and barristers will commence on Tuesday next, when tbo Wellington sessions of the Court open. The criminal list is a fairly small one, only six cases being set down for trial. The civil and divorce lists are long, however, no fewer than forty-eight matrimonial disputes having been set down for hearing. CRIMINAL CASES The following criminal cases will come before His Honour Air. Justice Alpers:— Florence Michael O’Donoghue ’ and AV illiam Michael Heenan, alleged breaking ;md entering and theft. Robert Vaughan Venables, alleged rape. Charles Ruddick, alleged breaking and entering and theft. Frank Barber, alleged receiving of stolen goods. Jane Anne Johnston, alleged breaking and entering with intent to commit a crime. Eangiamo Frank Alartin, alleged indecent assault on a male.

. CIVIL FIXTURES 'The following fixtures for civil actions have been made: — Friday, May 20. —Charles Phillips v. the New Zealand Shipping Company, Ltd., claim for 4330 for alleged negligence. Mond<y, Alay 23. —David Simpson and Mabel Simpson v. Alagnus Motors, Ltd., claim for 41065 12s. Gd. for alleged negligence. Tuesday, Alay 24.—Zita Mahoney v. Goring Coleridge Johnston, claim for 43000 for alleged breach of promise. Wednesday, May 25.—Isabella Henderson, v. Wright, Stephenson and Co., Ltd., claim for .£l5OO for alleged negligence. Thursday, Alay 26.—Donald Mclnnes Beil v. Charles W. Alack, claim for 4:1120 10s. for alleged negligence. Friday, May 27.—Thomas Afarr Timpany v. the "New Zealand Dairy Produce Exporter’’ Newspaper Co., Ltd., claim ior <£looo for alleged libel; Jane Ellen Hewett and Alfred de Bathe Brandon v. ■lhoiuas Kcnavin Collins and Elsie Alary Collins possession; the Guilford Timber Co., Ltd., v. Charles Henry Pym and Florence I’ym, possession. Monday, May 30.—Annie Janet Buddicom v. Joseph, Barnao, claim for 4501 ior alleged slander; the Sopwitb Aviation and Engineering Co., Ltd., and 1 homas Octavo Murdoch Sopwith v Magnus Motors. Ltd., claim for 4710 allegedly duet under judgment. May 31.-Williara GJendinD’ng v. Florence Kato Willingham, claim for 4216 Is., alleged balance under agreement, with counter-claim for 4276 allegedly due under agreement. IV ednesday, June 1.-Ada Frances VValker v. Olive Phillips aud Andrew Phillips, claim for 41000 for alleged slander; John Patrick Aloham v. Gasco Pressed Bricks, Ltd., claim for 41250 ■ls., for alleged negligence. Thursday, June 2.—Thomas Alfred Claughton aud Alary Elizabeth Barnett Claughton v. Charlotte Rebecca Bates and John Henry Bates, claim for 4'500 for alleged false representation; Ivy Hollingshead Willis v. David Brown Howden, Alary Elizabeth Howden, Amy Niblett Webb aud Ada Lily Howden, claim for 42000 for alleged negligence. Monday, June 6.—Albert Ernest Arlidgc v. Catherine Arlidgc, declaration, etc.; Louisa Williams v. Florence Million, claim fop 41000 for alleged breach of agreement. Tuesday. June 7.—Herbert Alfred Walker v. Joseph Suggit, claim for £155, alleged balance under agreement.

Wednesday, June 8. —Dominion Securities, Ltd., v. William Duncan, claim for 4300, allegedly due on shares; William If uglies Field and others v. Robert William Smith, appointment of receiver, etc.

Thursday. Juno 9.—The Public Trustee and others v. Robert D. Benjamin, specific performance, etc. Friday. June 10.—Jane Gifford Laurcnson v. the Mayor. Councillors, and citizens of Wellington, claim for 4825 3s. 9d.. for alleged negligence; the Australian Provincial Assurance Association, Ltd., v. Noble Frank Lowndes, claim for 41115 for alleged breach of agreement.' Monday, June 13.—F. Broomfield and others v. E. Sutherland and others, alleged breaches of trusts and accounts. Wednesday, June 15. —J. M. Bolton v. the Victoria Laundry Co.. Ltd., claim for 4250 for alleged negligence. Thursday, June 16.—Staples v. tlie Wellington City Council, compensation case; New Zealand Soap Co. y. Wellington Citv Council, compensation case. Fridav. June 17.—Georg? Henry Eugene Hills v. W._ B Girling and Co.. Ltd (in liquidation), claim tor £G6IO ,19s.’ 3d., alleged balance under agreement.

DIVORCE ACTIONS The following list of divorce actions comprises both defended and undefended cases. The latter will be dealt with on May 31. Before a Judge and Jury. Thomas William Warner v. Jean Mary Elizabeth Warner (alleged adultery). Before a Judge Alone. The following petitions for dissolution of marriage ou the ground of alleged adultery will be heard before a judg “'vincent Glcdhill v. Amy Amelia Gledhill. Ernest William James Gundy v. Ethel Cundy, Clarence Charles Campbell v. Doris Campbell, ivy Irene Beatrice Arney v. Herbert Alfred Arney, Lily May Raffel v. Thomas Baftel, Edward Ilham I’lavle v. Nilla Playle. Walter Bamford Hoaro v. Mary Ann Hoarc, Myra Rita Searl v. Percival Claude Seoll, Rita Max' Hannig v. Paul M alter Hannig. The following petitions on the ground of alleged desertion will be heard befoie a judge alone: , „. . Amelia Brons v. Inguard ie ' son Brons. Percy Procter v. Annie Iroctei, Julia King v. Edward Henry King, Matter George Bent v. Sibyl Frances Beni, Murdock Collie Henderson v. 'era Catherine Mary Henderson, Edward Frank Smith v. Marjono Elsa Ellen Smith, Alice Busbridge v. Peter Busbridye, Joseph Thomas Coster v. Maud Frances Coster, Alexander Beatty v. Nellie Beatty, Eugene Riordan y.l/ilecn Ann Riordan, Beatrice Louisa McDonald v John Edward McDonald, Charles Albert Ernest Purdey v. Phoebe I’urdey, Elizabeth Bovd v. M'illmm Boyd, Richard Driver v. Avary Aline Driver, < arlion Kerr v. Harold Richardson Kerr, Alice O’Kane v. Maurice O’Kane.. Thomas Wishart v. Janet Wishnrt. Doris Maud Lnwronea v. William John Jtowrence. Violet May Masker v. George Raymond Masker. , .■ The following petitions on tho ground of separation will bo heard before a judge alone: ~ J Rubie Marie Chapman v. Nnriiia n Rovle Chapman. W; bam George Sh Ilitig v. Annin Jane bbilling, Alice Ilil.da Cousins v. John Daniel C’ousm.s t.laira Elizabeth Edwards v Richard Allexn Edwards. Eleanor Courtney v. Frederick Courtney. Gladys Lilian M elbouine i. Henry Frederick Melbourne, Muriel Ewen Tattersall v. Henrv James lattersnll Emma Mnv Hedderwick v. John Edward Hedderwick, Edith Sarah Darragh v. Samuel Darragh. Jolin Kinloch Calder v Catherine Calder, Edith Sheridan v 'Marius Sheridan Isabella Hasten Manson v. Ralph Manson, hdward Since Hvlfon v. Phyllis Janet Hylton. S.ibil Marion Burt v. James Burt James Hvndman v. Lily Margaret Hyndman. Lucy Elizabeth Falconer v. James Albert Falconer. George Frederick Co ndale v. Ethel Cogdale. The following petitions for restitution of conjugal rights will bff heard before n lodge alone: , T , Benjamin Thomas Johnson r. Isobel

Flora Johnson, Havelock Henry Reynolds v. Thelma Gordon Reynolds. . The following petition for a judicial separation, on the ground of cruelty, will bo beard liefore a judge alone: Robert Johnston r. Jane Anne Johnston.