Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

SUBSTANTIAL BAIL NECESSARY

“INTENTIONS INDICATE ACTIONS ” In the Magistrate’s Court on Tuesday a young man, named Edward Lam-ley Pinching, described as a clerk, came before Mr. F. K. Hunt, S.M.. nn fi> chfitfxo of failing t>o Diaintuin Ips “11 ask that the accused be remanded to appear at Napier on Thursday, Raid Chief-Detective Kemp. “If bap is allowed I ask that it be substantial. Not only has this man deserted his wife, but induced a married woman to desert her husband and,child. They.were living at tho Arcadia under the name of Dawley.” His Worship: £100? Chief-Detective Kemp: £l5O would bo better. Mr. N. A. Foden, who appeared for the accused, declared that the circumstances under which the information had been laid were somewhat ob**curc. TFo contended /that the r/.oral aspect had no bearing on th 4 amount of I'.he hail. ’ , Chief-Detective Kemp: We can only taki? his intentions from his actions. And, wlrnt is more, he left his occupation without a moment’s notice. In fixing bail at £lOO, His Worship remarked that if the accused thought that there was anything in the nature of a malicious prosecution ho had his remedy .

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19230412.2.32

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 16, Issue 175, 12 April 1923, Page 5

Word Count
191

SUBSTANTIAL BAIL NECESSARY Dominion, Volume 16, Issue 175, 12 April 1923, Page 5

SUBSTANTIAL BAIL NECESSARY Dominion, Volume 16, Issue 175, 12 April 1923, Page 5