NEW ZEALAND CHIROPRACTORS ASSOCIATION.

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 298, 10 September 1921, Page 2

NEW ZEALAND CHIROPRACTORS ASSOCIATION.

’■ IMPORTANT NOTICE. (Published by Arrangement.) / . In view of the find to g of the jury in a recent Christchurch fcase to the effect that the use of violet rays and a certain leg movement amounted in the circumstances, to Cbironractio Mapractice, the New Zealand Chiropractors dcsiTPS to gtntGi _ 1 That according/to the Press reports counsel for the plaintiff ‘ asserted” that the care was not an at tack on Chiropractic, but on me method's adopted by a particular practitioner who was not a member of the Chironracforsi’ Association. 2 That the methods referred to, together with tho use of a hammer or pteximeter, form no part of Chiropractic as'taught by its foopder and as expounded and practised by the N.Z. AsB °3? a That the use of such, methods is not onlv not approved, but is expressly ana strictly forbidden by the rules of the Association. . 4 That no professing Chiropractor employing such methods could receive or retain membership in the Association. . 5. That the Association is irrevocablv opposed to “mixing" in every form, and stands always for straight Chiropractic —the thing that has done the work, the thing that has got the results the thing that has made the new science known and talked about thronchqjjt the length and breadth of New Zealand. Giles and Giles Auckland; and Duggan, Auckland; Otterhpit,Bryce, and Wratt, • Wellington; M'Beath and Colwill, Wellington; Young and Craig, Christchurch; J- A. Scott, Christchurch: C White-Partons. Christchurch: J. and J. Williamson, Dunedin; Anthony H. Thomson, Dunedin: Chrietle and Kinney, Dunedin; A. R. Nicol, Invercargill.