Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

MAGISTRATE’S COURT

POLICE AND CIVIL CASES. Mr. I’. K- Hunt, S.M., dealt with the police business in the Magistrates Court J A*remand for a week was granted in the case of Cyrus C. Hutton, w-ho was charged with the theft of Ms. in money, the' property of H. T. Martin. Bail was allowed in one surety of £-□. , Neville Elpich pleaded guilty m refusing to leave the City Hotel when requested to do so. Ho was fined A,a. and costs. On a charge of drunkenness he "foi° stowing away on the s.s. Karamu from Greymouth to Wellington, James Cain was ilned 20s. CIVIL CASES. Mr. E. Page, 8.M.. heard tho civil cases, and gave judgment for plaintiff by oefault in the following Office Appliances Go Ltd., V. IL Down, £2O 35.. costs £3 6s.’ Commercial Agency and Sharland and Co Ltd., v. Geurzo Karooze and Co.. £36 16s. 10d„ costs £3 Is. 6d.; W. H. Green and Co., Ltd., v. Mrs. E. J.. Wear £lO Is. 6d.. costs £3 Is.; 11. L. Levin v. W. Johnston. £42 Ils 3d., costs £4 17s. 6d , Vacuum Oil Co. V. Avery Bros., £7 10s.. costs £1 10s. 6d.; Star Agency Co. v. W. Powell, £6 18s.. costs £1 10s. 6d Vacuum Oil Co. v. Bell Bros., £l6 /s., costs £2 145.; John Swinson Co., Ltd. v. William B. Lacey, £23 , 17 . 9 ,--s. os, -.r-n 3 Commercial Agency and h. W, Mills and Go., Ltd., v. 11. Thoms. £4 10s., costs £1 6s. 6d.; Allan J. Salter v. Harold Wall, £3 costs £t 7s. 6d.; John Swinson Co.. Ltd., v. Frank Washbonrne, £4O ’ls.. costa £4 Is 6d.; Commercial Agency and Hill and Jackson v. P. W. Roberts, £23 12s. 2d., coats £3 2a.; Commercial Agency and W H. Tindall, Ltd., v. G. Houthee. £1 6s. 6d„ costa 16s. 6d : The Savage Pyro and Rubber Co. v. H. T- , Avc ry 3s Bd.. routs £3 55.: Hope Gibbous, .Ltd., D. A. Small £46 3<L, costs £1 10b.; Ma-x lossman v. Grace Wyborn. £lO IBs., costs £2 15s * Veitoh and Allan v. 11. Daube. £3 6« , costs £1 3a. 6d.; Blundell Bros. Ltd v. j.; W, Green. £• 105.,. costs Bb. ; J. S. Millner V. C. Thompson. £3 65., co’tsi £1 3s 6d.- R. A. Williamson v. G. Waddle, £5 6a costs £1 Us. 6d.; Richard I. Guggle v. P.’w. Howman. £1 9s. 6d„ costs 125.; Commercial Agency and Jenkins and Mack, Ltd. v. W. F. Stanley. £92 55.. costs £5 16s.;’ Veitch a-nd Allan v. M. Ixtracy, £3 35., costs £1 3s. 6d. JUDGMENT SUMMONS CASES. 0 Wadley was ordered to pay the Alexander Ross Engineering Co. £l9 18s. 6d. forthwith, in default twenty days Imprisonment, warrant to be suspended for two months. W. D. Kennedy ia to pay Mr. E. Buckland £.3 19s. 6d. forthwith, or go to gaol for four days, warrant to be suspended for one mouth. J. R. P.obertson was ordered to pay Veitch nnd Allan £3 12s. 4d„ in default four days’ imprisonment, warrant to bt suspended so long as he pays £1 per month. „ _ _ £. H. Ricketts is to pay Mrs. E. Kelly £3 7b. sd. immediately, in default io go gaol for four days, the warrant to be suspended for one month.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19210708.2.75

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 243, 8 July 1921, Page 7

Word Count
543

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 243, 8 July 1921, Page 7

MAGISTRATE’S COURT Dominion, Volume 14, Issue 243, 8 July 1921, Page 7