Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

ARMOUR AND COMPANY

fSfuS cinco^ardinß ocVwl for is purely and simply one to mnMn this firm to purchase and ship a proportion of W Zealand meat, and, that the firm of Armour*, Ltd., do not propose to cither bi l U, «r otherwise have any propnetao interest in miv freezing works in either tho North „v South Islands, and that they nra "villins to put all their purchases through farmers' freezin? works where possible. I wish to niako this point quite clear ns statements are beiiiEf circulated that tho (.'ranting of this license will cnabl# Messrs. Armour anfl Co. to purchase or build their own -works, and that they haw attempted to ptirelineo two freezing works in tho North Wand, both of which n<Bcrtions I am authorised' to state are miite contrary to fact, and have no fouridntion whatever. . The only effect the Rrantine of tliie license will have will lv> to eliminate tho commission or middleman a consummation devoutly be wished for by every genuine farmer.—l am, etc., WM. H. NTCHOLSON, Secretary, Canterbury Sheepovmeus' Union. Christchurch, August 5, IMO.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/DOM19200807.2.57.3

Bibliographic details

Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 269, 7 August 1920, Page 7

Word Count
180

ARMOUR AND COMPANY Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 269, 7 August 1920, Page 7

ARMOUR AND COMPANY Dominion, Volume 13, Issue 269, 7 August 1920, Page 7