A Bill of Rights case
Section 1 of the Bill of Rights 1688 says "the pretended power of suspending the laws, ,or the execution of law by rfegall authority without the of Parlyment is illegal.” Successive Ombudsmen Have found it unacceptable that departments should act to negate the law of Parliament, *dnd worse still to find cases where a department knows it is doing something which is contrary to law. The following dase was an example of this. J * The complainant, a partner in a" firm of Registered Surveyors, wished to lodge survey plans accompanied by prints of the relevant title plan pursuant to Regulation 36 (2) of the Survey Regulations 1972. This provision
was made to allow the release of survey information pending completion of local authority approvals and statutory endorsements on the original plans. The difficulty arose when the chief surveyor of the district issued a memorandum advising all practising surveyors that ... in order to improve production in plan examination ... section 36 (2) of the Survey Regulations will no longer be effective ... plans will “need to be lodged with both title and survey plan
complete ...” In the complainant’s opinion the regulations
gave the chief surveyor no such discretion.
In putting the complaint ta the Director-General of Lands, I expressed my view that the regulations were made with the author-, ity of Parliament, and remained in force. They could only be set aside with the leave of Parliament and that what the chief surveyor had done was contrary to law.
The department acknowledged that my statement of the pqsition could not be disputed, but justified the action on the grounds that double handling of documents in the office was avoided. I sustained the complaint and the instruction was withdrawn. — John Robertson, ' Chief Ombudsman.
Ombudsman’s casebook
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19891122.2.94
Bibliographic details
Press, 22 November 1989, Page 20
Word Count
296A Bill of Rights case Press, 22 November 1989, Page 20
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.