Domestic violence
Sir,— I applaud the Police Commissioner’s positive consideration towards adopting a sterner approach to “home assault” (February 6). However, I question the likelihood of preventing family violence by attempting to criminalise the perpetrator.
The Domestic Protection Act (1982) empowers the police to arrest a perpetrator (subject to a non-violence court order) and detain him for 24 hours. Although this arrest measure only applies when a non-violence order has been issued, it can be of assistance to the victims most at risk.
Through your columns may I ask the Commissioner of Police how many arrests under a nonviolence order have been made each year since the Domestic Protection Act was, passed? To what extent is this existing legislation being used by the police, and how well has it been tried? A problem with criminalising family violence is that victims may become even more afraid than they are at present to ask the police for help.—Yours, etc., PHILIP CLEARWATER. February 9, 1987.
[Commissioner M. T. Churches replies: “The police attend violent domestic disputes when called by the victim, a family member or some other person — usually a neighbour. The changes proposed — to increase the arrest option — from Sergeant Greg Ford’s report on domestic violence will give the courts the ability to sentence an aggressor to some type of counselling. This may help in modifying his violent behaviour. In the Hamilton
research there was no evidence that increased police action reduced the number of calls to the police. Victims said that they were better off under the new system. Your correspondent asks how often arrests have been made under a non-violence
order. Unfortunately, we do not ' keep statistics on this particular aspect. An arrest under a nonviolence order as outlined in the Domestic Protection Act allows the police to detain the person
for up to 24 hours without charging. This is used as a ‘cooling-off’ period. A breach of a nonmolestation order is, on the other hand, an offence which is liable to three months imprisonment or a $5OO fine, and such a person must be charged and brought before the court. Our latest statistics for domestic affairs breaches (which include nonmolestation orders) total 582 breaches for 1985. Of these 248 (43 per cent) resulted -in a prosection, 113 (19 per cent) offenders were warned, 123 (21 per cent) were cleared as no offence disclosed and 98 (17 per cent) were not solved. The police can only act if there are orders in existence. In most cases where police attend violent disputes it has been found that no court orders are in force.”]
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19870224.2.117.2
Bibliographic details
Press, 24 February 1987, Page 20
Word Count
432Domestic violence Press, 24 February 1987, Page 20
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.