Pornography
Sir, — I am sure there are many others — men and women — who agree with Susan Taylor (February 21). Pornography in all its forms — from soft to hardcore material — is an expression of hatred towards women; hatred because it is anti-women. Literature and movies that depict women as sex toys to be used and violated are fuel for the prejudices towards and crimes committed against women. People must wake up to this fact instead of accepting pornography as something that has always been part of our society and so must inevitably stay. I support Susan Taylor’s views — men and women, show your concern now and write to your local member of Parliament asking for legislation against this degrading material. — Yours, etc., E. COOPER. February 21, 1986. Sir, — The group of Women Against Pornography who spoke at the Labour Women’s Policy Conference in no way suggested that the depiction of loving sexual relations encouraged rape and incest. What was suggested, and in fact supported by the personal experience of women present, was that the depiction of sexual violence inflicted on women and children could be linked with the increase of rape and incest, particularly where they were shown as accepting or enjoying the violation. I would suggest that the members of the Society for the Promotion of Individual Responsibilities have not seen some of the material available on video tapes, which can easily be viewed by children and young people, often without their parents’ knowledge. Such material gives an entirely distorted view of the true nature of sexuality. — Yours, etc., JUDY M. WATERS.
February 25, 1986. Sir,—The last Labour Party conference, which endorsed Rogemomics by a clear majority, made great play of “the danger from the Right” and the “moral majority.” Susan Taylor’s letter (February 21), however, demonstrates that the majority of Labour women are themselves part of the “danger from the Right”. As a socialist, I do not believe that pornography as an 4 ' ■
expression of alienated sexuality can be eliminated by repressive legislation. History shows that such legislation is almost impossible to enforce and invariably used to censure free-expression in other areas. A socialist approach would be to make pornography a non-profit activity, maintain a publicly-accessible list of pornography consumers, insert anti-pornographic messages in pornographic material, and wage a broad educational campaign against the sexual exploitation of women. — Yours, etc. JURRIAAN BENDIEN. February 21, 1986.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19860227.2.75.7
Bibliographic details
Press, 27 February 1986, Page 12
Word Count
396Pornography Press, 27 February 1986, Page 12
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.