Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

‘Tit-for-tat’ claim denied

PA Auckland An Auckland pro-Pales-tinian group denies that its complaint to the Race Relations Office about the Leon Uris novel, “The Haj," was in response to Jewish comKints about anti-Semitic ks sold in Auckland. The Race Relations Conciliator, Mr Hiwi Tauroa, said he believed that several complaints about “The Haj” were “tit-for-tat” for his decision to refer three anti-Jewish books to the Human Rights Commission for possible banning. The Auckland Palestinian

Rights Campaign spokeswoman, Catherine Frey, said yesterday her group had made the complaint over the way Mr Uris dealt with Palestinians in his novel. “I think the anti-Jewish books are offensive, too,” she said. “But I hope Mr Tauroa’s people will make some response to our complaint.” The Race Relations Office says complaints about “The Haj” came from several pro-Palestinian groups. One complaint was made before the book was on general sale in New Zealand.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19860116.2.93

Bibliographic details

Press, 16 January 1986, Page 10

Word Count
149

‘Tit-for-tat’ claim denied Press, 16 January 1986, Page 10

‘Tit-for-tat’ claim denied Press, 16 January 1986, Page 10