Page 41 Advertisements Column 1

Press, 19 December 1985, Page 41

- ~?~ % •^®^^i?^^^A^ w i^s :;^fcß^( ' :; z? ' - ■ Bi "' - W '"'^'^a w BF mhh M- 13 ]IM =■ BBMMBMBB ” ■ M NMMNHNMk ■ ,<c L'* " ;> - m more competition more choice w n is il No more winners ■M J®F . (X “Long term this will be disastrous both for / - .-jfflM ?( the industry and the public because there \ /2 will be increasing erosion of competition, 1 choice of product and quality will be at risk.” I Federation of Wine and Food Federation. 1 VilhMamWinnc hailed I ■ Bese in Newzeaianu. M These two wines won three went into voluntary receivership - m H P for NZ wines at e recent victim of an insane prte-entting y ““ z Xd Z wine -1983 diat now threatens to dest Y Villa Maria Private Bin Pinot Noir. Best Zealands leading independent win ew Zealand overall wine -1983 Villa makers. , Maria Private Bin Pinot Noir. Best New Villa Maria s sister company, Zealand White Wine -1984 Villa Maria Vidal is also in receivership. I 3 private Bin Sauvignon Blanc. o , TA 1 ■■ IfyoulikeVilhMariaorVidalWines So too, now is Delegat s. and you want to boy them in the future. Maybe there are too many please buy them now. grapes. Maybe there are advantages in m9B It is quite literally the being able to buy wine 50% below yw on do to preserve clxxce. cost. .. But there is no advantage to WSRfe anyone - especially the consumer if f \7 IO A I all that survives are one or two | *]2S v * powerful wine monopolies. wSYAd WtaMMMF WINNING WINES gnaktis