Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Mental health law reform

Sir,—Lindsay Randle (March 1) expresses dismay that recommendations for reform of the Mental Health Act advanced by the Task Force on Revision of Mental Health Legislation do not include proposals for changes in the judicial process whereby a patient may be committed by a District Court judge. The report contains proposals for extensive changes to this process which would permit patients, either personally or through a representative, to confront those giving evidence against them, and to have access to all written information before the court. Proposals for significant changes in this process have also been advanced by the Health Department We assure the writer that an effort was made to contact patients’ groups while the report was being prepared. We regret that our finances did not permit discussions in the South Island. Any further comments on the report are most welcome.—Yours, etc., JOHN DAWSON, Task Force on Revision of Mental Health Legislation. March 13, 1984. v

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19840319.2.90.4

Bibliographic details

Press, 19 March 1984, Page 18

Word Count
160

Mental health law reform Press, 19 March 1984, Page 18

Mental health law reform Press, 19 March 1984, Page 18