Page 15 Advertisements Column 1

Press, 3 February 1984, Page 15

This pool is swimming in bacteria As far as the eye can see, this is everyone's addition on hot sunny days. This probably iHo . nf » nerfect nool contributed to the superior over-all performance It looks P clear and clean - and very inviting. of 'BAQUACIL'in this survey." Yet put a sample of the water under a (Australian Medical Journal — May Edition, 1981 > microscope, and a very different story emerges. There's very little we can add to that, excpet Although it's been treated regularly with a to touch on the subject of algae, a perennial traditional pool treatment, bacteria is very much concern. in evidence. The good news is that'BAQUACIL, in Bacteria which is a potential source of conjunction with ICl's recommended algicide infection to the eyes, ears and throat of the will control difficult algae, again — without unsuspecting swimmer. affecting the swimmer. So how can you make sure this doesn’t They're both non-corrosive at use levels, will happen to you? not irritate the eyes, have no smell or taste, and .. —i , . give the water a clear look and clean feel. 'Baquacil. There's not more 9 exnensive is it’ effective pool treatment. Ifused prQ P rly the . BAQUAC | L 'treatment There is no more effective pool treatment for , process is no more expensive than other forms killing bacteria than non-chlorine 'BAQUACIL of treatment. from ICI. It's ICl's policy that'BAQUAClL'stockists - - — provide and expert pool treatment back-up service. So, if you have any queries on the use —~~—of the'BAQUAClL'treatment process or on i pool servicing, contact your'BAQUACIL' \ / \ stockists or ICI. ■ ' Bacreria/natypica/ 'BAQUACIL' - treated sißaquag®?/ sample of poo! water, pool water 2 weeks after not treated with application- still ? ■BAQUACIL.' virtually bacteria-free. And that's an opinion shared by the Medical Journal of Australia. . They published a survey comparing 'BAQUACIL' with its most commonly used ♦ V counterpart, and the results make very — interesting reading - particularly the following. "This survey indicates that owners of pools ZICfX U *3 <ll need to be made aware that their pools can DdUUC&VII harbour potentially pathogenic bacteria unless X—X XSStSSK“S'™”""'’" ' „ Cares for the swimmer JSISSSSSS?’ as well as the pool approximately 14 days between routine additions, whereas (the alternativ epool f ICl_\ SSSSK*SSTAS’SSSS" *—■> ™ FREFpOoTwATERTESTiNG~ (Pllfl) PYNE ' GOULD, GUINNESS LIMITED Liverpool Street - Blenheim Road