Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Port of Oamaru

Sir, — Your .feature regarding the New Zealand Ports Authority’s decision not to reopen the port of Oamaru (“The Press,” July 9), was an eye-opener. A statutory authority has carefully reviewed the

available evidence and decided that reopening the port is not an economic proposition in the national interest. Cr Helen Stead has courageously pointed out that $5O million in taxpayers’ subsidies are required for the cement exporting project, while markets are uncertain and production at other New Zealand cement works is running at only 60 per cent of capacity. Yet everyone in Oamaru seems quite frank in their cynical expectation that the Government will again overturn the decision of a statutory authority, and pour $5O million into propping up another ill-conceived Think Big project, just for the sake of rescuing Mr Jonathan Elworthy from electoral oblivion. What protection do taxpayers have from this sort of politics? — Yours, etc., PETER S. GRANT. Nelson July 11, 1983.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830716.2.111.2

Bibliographic details

Press, 16 July 1983, Page 16

Word Count
158

Port of Oamaru Press, 16 July 1983, Page 16

Port of Oamaru Press, 16 July 1983, Page 16