Nuclear radiation
Sir,—Mr Hugh Atkinson presents some poorly reasoned arguments in his comments (“The Press,” June 24), but two points cannot be disputed. He suggests that Dr Ber--tell is “talking rubbish in some areas.” True, except that Dr Bertell’s “rubbish” is the pollution and radioactive material which Mr Atkinson seems so unconcerned about. Again, Mr Atkinson says that “New Zealand scientists are not concerned about conditions in the Pacific Islands arising from nuclear testing causing major health problems.” Dr Bertell would agree. It is a little unfortunate however, or has Mr Atkinson forgotten, that New Zealand is also a Pacific island? If we allow such complacency to continue for much longer there will be no clean water left for Mr Atkinson’s contaminated fish to cleanse itself in.—Yours, etc., CHRISTOPHER J. KING. June 24, 1983.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19830628.2.97.9
Bibliographic details
Press, 28 June 1983, Page 20
Word Count
134Nuclear radiation Press, 28 June 1983, Page 20
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.