Liquigas concerned about definition in new bill
Parliamentary reporter Liquigas is disturbed that a definition in a new bill may subject it to the planning consents of local authorities. Liquigas is responsible for setting --.up an L.P.G. bulk distribution network in New Zealand, and its application to build a pipeline between Lyttelton and Woolston has been the subject of a fivemonth Commission of Inquiry which has just ended. Liquigas told the Commerce and Energy Parliamentary Select Committee that the Petroleum Amendment Bill exempted pipeline between a “transport system” and a “bulk storage installation" from pipeline needing authorisation to proceed from the Minister of Energy. "The Lyttelton-Woolston stretch of pipeline was subject to such an authorisation, but the Minister used his prerogative to call a Commission of Inquiry into it.The authorisation procedure required the Minister to
take into account "all matters. circumstances and representation" considered relevant, but avoids the need for planning hearings by local authorities. Liquigas told the committee that if pipeline between harbours and bulk storage depots was not “pipeline" subject to Ministerial authorisation. the company would be obliged to gain consents under the Town and Planning Act, 1977, from up to four local authorities in some cases. This would cause time delays. contradictory results, appeals and confusion in the public mind over procedures. Liquigas said.
It asked for an amendment to the bill defining pipeline to include “any pipeline for the conveyance of L.P.G. between bulk storage and wharf unloading other than pipelines purely within the harbour area." BP Gas and Oil said that pipeline between a bulk installation and another bulk installation also appeared to be excluded from the authorisation procedures. It believed that the point of the exemption in the Government’s mind was to exclude pipelines from ocean installations to wharves, and from depots to railway sidings from authorisation procedures.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19821127.2.39
Bibliographic details
Press, 27 November 1982, Page 5
Word Count
304Liquigas concerned about definition in new bill Press, 27 November 1982, Page 5
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.