Dispute over cold pay
The criteria for setting special pay rates for working in cold temperatures are hopelessly inadequate and out of touch with the changed conditions in the freezing industry, the Arbitration Court heard in Christchurch yesterday. The Court was hearing evidence related to a claim by fitters employed at the Canterbury ’ Frozen Meat Company’s Canterbury Freezing Works for extra pay for periods in which they are required to work in freezing chambers. They seek 25 per cent above the ordinary award rate for working in temperatures between —14.4 degrees and —2O degrees, and 50 per cent above the ordinary rate for temperatures between —20.1 degrees and —34 degrees. The fitters’ case was. taken up by the Engineers’ Union, represented by Miss B. A. Buckett; Miss A. K. Knowles appeared for the Canterbury Frozen Meat Company. Miss Buckett said that modern freezer requirements had meant a rapid decline in the temperatures used in the industry. The current criteria for determining “cold” working conditions were based on a 1946 benchmark temperature of —l.l degrees which, she said, was no longer rele-
vant. She said that the matter before the Court had been filed as a dispute of interest with regular monotony, but the employers had refused to accede to the claim in conciliation. This had resulted in a number of "special payments” being made as “inhouse” arrangements elsewhere. ■ • Miss Buckett argued that the conditions under which the work was carried out were the same as those for which others in the industry were being paid extra. Miss Knowles said that the claim should not be considered in isolation from the rest of the country or from other employees covered by different awards in the freezing industry. Freezing workers, electricians, carpenters and engineers were all expected to work in freezing chambers and other “cold” areas, yet no extra payments of the type claimed were made to any other groups at the Canterbury Freezing Works. She said that engineers employed at the Canterbury Freezing Works were already paid above-award rates. The Court, which deferred a decision on whether it had the jurisdiction to consider the claim, reserved its decision.; -
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19821120.2.34.24
Bibliographic details
Press, 20 November 1982, Page 7
Word Count
357Dispute over cold pay Press, 20 November 1982, Page 7
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.