Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Mice at protest

Sir,—l have been fascinated by reactions to the mice-throw-ing incident and the cruelty to animal point of view.’When dogs' miss- -their? owners, whether it be for an hour or a week, the ensuing disturbance and irritation to the neighbours

is written off because if the animal is being adequately fed, “nothing can be done.” Barbara Woodhouse has said quite firmly that it is sheer cruelty to leave dogs for any length of time, and yet she appears to be a voice crying in the wilderness. When will the S.P.C.A. 'make up its collective mind? If animals can suffer from mental cruelty, this legal protection should extend to pets as well as to defenceless animals with no clear owner. The mental cruelty other people suffer from living near unsupervised and unhappy animals gets no legal protection unless the problem disturbs at least three households; sympathy is notably absent. People have strange priorities. — Yours, etc., ■ ■■■ .

LEITH E. HOLLAND. August 16, 1982.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19820819.2.104.6

Bibliographic details

Press, 19 August 1982, Page 20

Word Count
162

Mice at protest Press, 19 August 1982, Page 20

Mice at protest Press, 19 August 1982, Page 20