Mr Hutton at appeal hearing
PA Wellington The detective who led the Arthur Allan Thomas investigation, the former Detective Chief Inspector Bruce Hutton. yesterday told a Court of Appeal hearing he had been prevented from giving evidence he should have been allowed to give at the second hearing of the case. Replying to a question by the Chief Justice. Sir Ronald Davison, Mr Hutton said his reason for joining Supreme Court proceedings on the case was to be able to give evidence "without being stopped." He asserted he was stopped from giving statements in the manner he had wanted to about the way he
had carried out the Crewe murder inquiry, and was "not permitted" to read his prepared brief and then be cross-examined. Mr Hutton and Mrs Margaret Johnston, the widow of Detective L. J. Johnston, with the New Zealand Police Association and the NewZealand- Police Officers’ Guild, have made an application for review of some findings of the Royal Commission on the Arthur Allan Thomas case. They have also appealed against a decision of a Full Court sitting in the High Court at Auckland on August 29. 1980. A full Bench of Court of Appeal judges is hearing the
application, which is expected to last about two weeks.
To counsel for the Royal Commission. Mr J. T. Eichelbaum, Mr Hutton said it had "started to cross his mind” that allegations of police impropriety might be raised before his second appearance.
He said he saw no reason to consider personal representation, and thought he was being represented generally as one of the police. He said in the light of the commission's findings he now considered he had been disadvantaged in researching his statement to the commission.
His requests for access to material were not actually
refused but had been put off because the material was being used by the commission. Mr Hutton said. In cross-examination. Mr Hutton said more people than he originally , stated may have been in the police party working at the Thomas house the day the controversial cartridge case was found. He had originally mentioned five, including police photographers. Mr Hutton said he . had obtained transcripts of some evidence given to the commission. because he considered it would help him to assist the commission. He said he had taped all conversations relating to the case as he intended one day to write a book about it.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19820317.2.12
Bibliographic details
Press, 17 March 1982, Page 1
Word Count
400Mr Hutton at appeal hearing Press, 17 March 1982, Page 1
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.