False-packaging verdict shocks cosmetics men
NZPA London Britain’s cosmetic industry was shocked this week by a jury’s decision that the manufacturers of a moisturising cream had infringed the Trades Description Act by packaging the product in a jar that contained a false bottom, although the weight was correctly given on the label.
The jury decided that A. and F. Pears had infringed the act because -the plastic jar was 30 per cent larger than the volume of cream it contained.
“Everybody in the industry is astounded by this case,” said Aubrey Ridley-Thomp-son, spokesman for the large chemists chain, Boots. “This kind of design has been used for years and many products will have to be changed if this case is upheld on appeal. It will cost
a terrific amount of money, millions of pounds,” he said. The cosmetic industry will not be the only one to be affected.
“The food industry is well into the game, too,” said the “Daily Express.” . “The exquisite pot of marmalade,- with Victorian hunting scenes on the lid, tempts many a tourist. And inside . . a tiny plastic container of marmalade.
"Maddening but' legal — provided the manufacturer has supplied the contents promised in the small print,” said the paper. But the jury at Croydon Crown Court, in south London, decided that although the volume and'weight was clearly displayed on the cream jar, it was considered to be misleading as the false bottom left an empty space inside the jar.
David Tench, legal officer of the Consumers’ Association, praised the jury for showing some “good oldfashioned common sense.” The case was described as a legal precedent by an official of Lambeth Council, which brought the prosecution.
He said the manufacturers would have to state what steps they intended to take to remedy the situation when the court resumed today for sentencing.
But Mr Ridley-Thompson commented: “I don’t feel defrauded when I buy a box of chocolates and find a lot of corrugated paper inside. “This verdict means that instead of buying your wife or girlfriend an attractive box of chocolates, we may in the future have to hand her loose chocolates in’a paper bag.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19811031.2.65.13
Bibliographic details
Press, 31 October 1981, Page 9
Word Count
357False-packaging verdict shocks cosmetics men Press, 31 October 1981, Page 9
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.