Website updates are scheduled for Tuesday September 10th from 8:30am to 12:30pm. While this is happening, the site will look a little different and some features may be unavailable.
×
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Search powers condemned

Proposals to extend police powers to search criminal suspects, recommended by the Criminal Law Reform Committee, have been criticised by the Legal Association.

The suggested procedures had- insufficient safeguards against abuse, said Mrs M. R. Evans, the association’s chairman.

Unless a suspect consented to a police search, the police would have to apply to a District Court judge for an order. However, only the police would have the right to be heard. Once the order was made the suspect could object only on

“genuine religious or medical grounds.” Given the limited grounds for objection, and the fact that only the police could be heard in court, it was likely that many suspects might be persuaded to “capitulate” and consent to a search. One of the most alarming aspects of the recommended procedure was that it could be used before a suspect was arrested, said Mrs Evans. Although the ■ police would have to show “reasonable” grounds before a search order would be granted, these grounds would no( necessarily be as substantial as those which would justify an arrest.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800811.2.55.10

Bibliographic details

Press, 11 August 1980, Page 4

Word Count
180

Search powers condemned Press, 11 August 1980, Page 4

Search powers condemned Press, 11 August 1980, Page 4