Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Bexley tip

Sir, — The reply by the Town Clerk to S. H. Smith’s letter about the Bexley tip gives, in part, misleading information. Recycling and composting, when carried out by the Christchurch and Auckland City Ccuncils respectively, are more expensive than land filling but a different type of recycling and a much better method of composting could be carried out at Bexley tip at a reduced cost to the council. Written and verbal approaches to the chairman of the resource recovery subcommittee have still not brought a full investigation into my proven methods and ideas which have also shown such non-financial benefits as a great reduction of smells, flies, rodents, fires and space needed. As all matter which can rot is recyclable then by far the greater part of the rubbish stream can be reused in one form or another. Is the

council going to check these possibilities or continue to dodge them? — Yours, etc., PETER BROWN. May 1, 1980.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19800506.2.122.1

Bibliographic details

Press, 6 May 1980, Page 24

Word Count
160

Bexley tip Press, 6 May 1980, Page 24

Bexley tip Press, 6 May 1980, Page 24