Sex insiruction in schools

Press, 15 April 1980, Page 22

Sex insiruction in schools

Sir,'— Advocates, of sexinstruction in. schools consider ignorance the source of our problems, and fear that failure to introduce it gives the impression'that sex is dirty. Opponents fear its introduction/ will force upon their children mass instruction; geared to the “lowest common denominator”, element, and so undermine the more spiritual, sensitive, and responsible aspects. Antagonistic exchanges ■in emotive

language will do nothing to help, but two positive steps can- be taken. First, factual evidence should be obtained on -overseas programmes — whether these - attempted to convey; conservative values, liberal values, or -non values instruction, and with' this an assessment of any : reSults in terms of changes'in rates of such objectively measurable items as unwanted pregnancies, marriage stability, V.D., and sex crimes. : Second; /parental competence in instruction should be 1 increased by assessing, promoting or providing,/suitable materials; and by organising voluntary co-operative learning groups. The Government, and all interested, bodies face ..this challenge. '. — Yoursi’e'tc., " E. READ. :. Christchurch.April 13, 1980. , ’