Charges arising from slogan- printing denied
Two young men who were] said to be members of the; Canterbury University Amiapartheid Club denied in the I Magistrate’s Court yesterday I charges of wilful damage' arising from their allegedly i painting anti-apartheid slogans on walls and on a roadway in the city during the! visit to Christchurch of >he| South African Consul-Gen-; eral, Mr P. R. Lindhorst, in April. They are John Leslie Bors-I boom.’ aged 19, a university student (Mr R. J. Mur- I fitt) and Stephen Robert Bay-| lis, aged 25, a dustman (Mr! D. N. Hampton). Each denied five charges I of wilful damage involving l the painting of anti-apartheid, slogans on walls, and a road , The charges related to the! Sydenham Bowling Club, the I Evangelical Church in Moor-1 house Avenue, Wrightson| NMA Ltd., Raceway Motors, Ltd, and the road-' way at the intersection of! Waltham Road and Byron I Street, on the overhead': bridge approach. Damage involved in the five charges was stated in the police charge sheets to be| $440. Neither counsel called evi-I dence for the defence, but; made submissions, after; which Mr F. G. Paterson,' S.M., reserved his decision until Thursday. The offences allegedly occurred on or about April 9. Prosecution evidence was
I given that a woman saw; ; three persons get out of a j I car at 12.30 a.m. on April 9; | and apparently clamber up I [the brick wall of Race- ! way Motors. Ltd. The driver, i i who looked similar to the i defendant Borsboom, re-1 ' mained in the car. Witness notified the police.; |Cross-examined, witness said’ [she later saw slogans painted' lon the wall. She had not! iseen them there the previous iday. j Police witnesses gave evi- j | dence of being directed toi |the Wrightson NMA buildI ing in Moorhouse Avenue | land finding Borsboom in al |car. He told a constable he! 'had driven off without his! | friends as they had told him ! to do this “if there was any I i trouble.’’ He admitted having; j painted slogans in the vic-1 I inity, and at two other loca-1 tjons that evening. An aero- > : sol spray paint tin was found ! iin the car. Eletective Sergeant K. A. I ; McFadyen said he searched ; I the car driven by Borsboom and found a wallet with a driving licence, and student I identification card in Bav- ! liss’s name. Borsboom told him thai he and “Steve” Bayliss were ; members of the university anti-apartheid club and had gone with two others, whom he would not name, to a service station, and bought a: can of spray paint. Bayliss and he bought the i
[paint and painted slogans at i several locations. Detective Sergeant Mc- | Fadyen said he called at Bayliss’s residence at 5.15 a.m. : Bayliss said “no comment” to most of his inquiries. There I were flecks of paint on his ‘fingernails. i Mr Hampton, in his submissions, said that apart [from some rather indirect or I vague evidence relating to Raceway Motors there was •no evidence before the court ; against Bayliss. There was no •evidence that the places concerned were undamaged before. j He also submitted that the [Offences with which Bayliss I was charged did not come within a wilful damage ■ charge. Wilful damage was I not a proper charge to cover [this situation. There was nothing in <he evidence. only suspicion against Bayliss, Mr Hampton isaid. Mr Murfitt said there was no evidence against Borsboom that he was involved ! in painting the slogan on the Sydenham Bowling Club’s premises. He also submitted that the alleged offences did | not constitute “criminal damage” with which Borsboom had been charged. In answer to the submissions Sergeant S. G. Jones contended that defacing of a property bv paint.. : ing slogans without the own[er's consent did constitute I I wilful damage.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790717.2.41
Bibliographic details
Press, 17 July 1979, Page 4
Word Count
636Charges arising from slogan- printing denied Press, 17 July 1979, Page 4
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.