Wage-rise onus on employers?
PA Wellington! Differing views about who should be responsible for containing excessive wage rises emerged from the Employers' Federation annual council meeting yesterday. .1 Federation leaders called on the Government for protection against “bullying and stand-over tatcics” by militant unions, and the Minister of Labour (Mr Bolger) declared that the federation should exercise control over “soft” wage settlements by individual employers. He said that the Swedish Employers’ Federation had the power to penalise members who breached wage guidelines, the Volvo car manufacturer being one firm that last year had paid a penalty of $44,000. “Perhaps this federation
needs to consider a similar approach,” Mr Bolger said. “Soft” wage agreements early in this year’s wage round by employers planning to recover costs on a market without price control would have a “severe and j disruptive effect” on wage relativities,” Mr Bolger said. Such settlements when fed into later negotiations could be ruinous. “I raise this matter not iust to create straw men to knock them down, but because your federation, through your executive director, too often when appealing for Government support to help resist unreasonably high wage claims, has | to inform me that, unfortunately, some employers have already agreed to pay the new rates, thereby undermining the whole ap-
proach of responsible wage settlements,” he said. Earlier, the Employers’ Federation president (Mr J. G. S. Reid) siad employers were relying on the promise made by the Prime Minister (Mr Muldoon) at Orewa in January “to improve the lot of the vulnerable employer.” “We cannot much longer sustain this loose situation where the employer remains unprotected,” Mr Reid said. The federation’s executive director (Mr J. W. Rowe) accused some union leaders of a deliberate attempt to exacerbate industrial relations and worsen inflation. He said it was “no doubt politically motivated.
“In some cases one suspects that union officials welcome wild cat strikes or even foment them, as just another way of causing trouble,” he said.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19790329.2.31
Bibliographic details
Press, 29 March 1979, Page 4
Word Count
327Wage-rise onus on employers? Press, 29 March 1979, Page 4
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.