Repeal petition methods ‘cause for concern’
Methods employed by the Repeal organisation to gain signatures for its petition to repeal the abortion legislation should concern everyone said the Minister of Social Welfare (Mr Walker) in Christchurch on Saturday. Mr Walker was speaking at a seminar run by the Society for Protection of the Unborn Child (S.P.U.C.). When a first-year student had gone to enrol at Canterbury University, one of the first forms she was handed to sign for her language course was a Repeal document, which she declined to sign, Mr Walker said. Many young students must have found themselves l in a dilemma with the • thought that refusal to sign • this form might affect their I future at university, he said. ■ ‘‘l am not a member of |S.P.U.C„” Mr Walker said. “I lam simply an ordinary New I Zealander who happens to ' share the view of most other New Zealanders that abortion is an abhorrent desecration of a women’s | body. Recentlv he bad received more than 700 messages from people throughout New Zealand supporting the way .he voted in the recent debate in Parliament, and 21 against. The only defence that the .pro-abortionists could muster was to assert that all
support came from S.P.U.C. or Roman Catholics, but that was wide of the mark, Mr Walker said.
Repeal claimed to have 125,000 signatures on its petition: about 4 per cent of the population. This, he said, was not very impressive, particularly when many of those who had signed did not know what it was all about. “I have not been intimidated by the tactics of the pro-abortionists,” Mr Walker said. Actions included the painting of slogans on his house, fence, and driveway in Papanui and on the driveway of his Ministerial residence in Lower Hutt, as well as abusive telephone calls to his wife and himself, and obnoxious anonymous letters.
Abortion was more than just the termination of pregnancy, Mr Walker said. Its proliferation was a threat to the very basis of New Zealand society — strong family life.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19780410.2.55
Bibliographic details
Press, 10 April 1978, Page 6
Word Count
339Repeal petition methods ‘cause for concern’ Press, 10 April 1978, Page 6
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.