The C.I.A. in New Zealand
The naming of Mr Daniel Cameron of the United States Embassy as a member of the Central Intelligence Agency is not in itself important, even if it is correct information. The C.LA. appears to have agents in most countries in the world so that no particular significance attaches to finding an agent in Wellington. Presumably, if the identification of Mr Cameron is correct, he was already known to some New Zealand security officials. What is important is what C.LA staff do in New Zealand and whether the New Zealand Government is fully acquainted with their activities. This is the nub of the charges made by Dr M. E. Bassett, a former Labour member of Parliament. If the C.LA. had, for instance, been bribing New Zealand trade union officials to persuade their members to take action serving the interests of the United States, that would certainly constitute interference in New Zealand’s domestic affairs. The allegations made by Dr Bassett fall far short of that. When the Prime Minister (Mr Muldoon) said that he was the only person in the Government who knew exactly what was happening on security
matters, he was speaking, presumably, as Minister in charge of the S.I.S. His predecessors, Mr Rowling and the late Mr Kirk, had the same access to security information. The Prime Minister of the day decides whether to pass on to his Cabinet, or to the Leader of the Opposition, any confidential information Mr Muldoon withheld from Mr Rowling last year a confidential report from the former Chief Ombudsman, Sir Guy Powles, on the 5.1.5., because Mr Rowling declined to give the assurances Mr Muldoon sought. Mr Rowling may have been offended by Mr Muldoon’s insistence on a written undertaking, but Mr Muldoon had at least not denied the right of the Leader of the Opposition to have access to the same information as the Prime Minister.
President Carter condemned the “ dirty tricks brigade ” of the C.LA. before he took office. If Mr Muldoon can persuade the President that the C.I.A. in New Zealand has been guilty of interference in New Zealand’s domestic affairs he will assuredly order the practice to cease But Mr Muldoon will need better evidence than Dr Bassett has so far produced, or even hinted that he could produce.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19770524.2.128
Bibliographic details
Press, 24 May 1977, Page 18
Word Count
384The C.I.A. in New Zealand Press, 24 May 1977, Page 18
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Copyright in all Footrot Flats cartoons is owned by Diogenes Designs Ltd. The National Library has been granted permission to digitise these cartoons and make them available online as part of this digitised version of the Press. You can search, browse, and print Footrot Flats cartoons for research and personal study only. Permission must be obtained from Diogenes Designs Ltd for any other use.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.