Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Mussel-farming site not settled yet

IFrom Our Own Reporter) WELLINGTON. * Plans to establish a mussel-farming industry in Akaroa will move a step closer when the applicant for a marine farm lease and licence. Mr ( . .1. Marsh, of Orari, and the Akaroa County Council agree on a site in the harbour. Mr Marsh applied in August. 1974, for “a iease/licence of an area of five acres m Akaroa harbour (Titoki Bay, Lucas Bay and Lucas Peak Point) for 14 years to farm; green mussel, with the possi-l bility of oysters.” The application was made; to the Fisheries Management! Division of the Ministry of; Agriculture and Fisheries! which, in concert with the! Ministry of Transport, is the; licensing authority. The Minister (then Mr: Moyle) responded to the application by requiring Mr Marsh to choose just one instead of several sites. He chose a site just south of Tikao Bay on the western side of the harbour. Mr Marsh was then advised to approach the Akaroa Harbourmaster to discuss ac ceptable specifications for'

I marking the site, and found' i there were two harbour-1 masters involved — Mr W. F.'i Sheward for Akaroa Harbour: . and the honorary harbour- i master of Tikao Bay (Mr L.|] A. Wright). TWO PROBLEMS During Mr Marsh’s dis-, ', missions with the two; ■ harbourmasters and the Akaroa County Engineer (Mr K. ■ A. Paulin; two problems came to light. The site he had chosen: was in the middle of a yachtracing course and was also, within a few hundred metres of a site from which the! Akaroa County Council intends to discharge sewage. Either problem would probably render the site unsuitable to the Ministry, on ithe grounds that the mussels ■ might fail to meet health! .requirements and that the) Jmussel rafts “not interfere! [unduly with navigation or sport in the vicinity.” Mr Paulin wrote to the [two harbour masters for! ..their views, advising them) that — generally — the Aka-i ’ roa County Council was in-i uterested in fostering new in-i ' dustry in the area and that •jthe council would make an effort to help establish marline farming in the harbour if possible. He said the ’■ health and yachting probr'lems m ight prevent Tikao!

;Bay being acceptable, even lif ‘in other aspects it was 'the. best site available. Mr Paulin advised the [Ministry that Mr Sheward! [had investigated the possibility of a marine farm and lother possible sites, and was of the opinion that mussel) ‘farming could be conducted.! NOT AGREED It appeared that an area; [south of Wainui or the Kaikj was perhaps the only area! where mussel farming could) [be conducted without prob-) lems of vandalism to the! ;mussel rafts or conflict with) inormal boating activity, ac-; [cording to Mr Sheward. [ Mr Marsh has not agreed, so far that his Tikao Bay site: would conflict with health or) boating requirements, but he) has been told by the Fisher-j ies Management Division to! [go back to the Akaroa’ [County Council to reach a [compromise, before the can be granted, j The Akaroa County Counjcil is constituted as the harfbour board, and the Ministry Swill not overrule a harbour [board decision. Both the Minister of Agriculture and Fishjeries and the Minister of (Transport — who have the ultimate power to grant licences — would have to be absolutely satisfied that a 1 harbour board’s objections were groundless and would have to be able to prove it tin court.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19751216.2.33

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXV, Issue 34027, 16 December 1975, Page 5

Word Count
562

Mussel-farming site not settled yet Press, Volume CXV, Issue 34027, 16 December 1975, Page 5

Mussel-farming site not settled yet Press, Volume CXV, Issue 34027, 16 December 1975, Page 5