Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

The Groups Show

Sir, — Your art writer’s I commentary on the Group, iShow called into doubt the'

I professionalism and committment of participants in the ’exhibition. I know that all [members of the Group have proved their professionalism, [capability, and commitment through many years of paint[ing and exhibiting and spending a great deal of their time in the teaching and administration of the visual arts. I am incensed when their commitment in terms of the considerable strains, worries, energy, and talent that have gone into the making of their reputations is described as “frequently less than total, their behaviour dilettantist.” Each member can stand alone by 'his.or her work and all have earned recognition by art authorities throughout New Zealand, and often beyond these shores. Your writer, “understands” that the Group came into being as a reactioni against moderpism. He is wrong. Hotere and Hanly are not “outside guests,” they are long-standing and active members. — Yours, 'etc., JOHN COLEY, Chairman, The Group. October 15, 1975. [Our art critic, T.L.R.W., replies: "I respect Mr Coley’s right to criticise my comments, as I believe the Group respects my role as a critic of the exhibition. 1 cannot see anything to be gained from protracted public discussion.”]

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19751018.2.105.3

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXV, Issue 33977, 18 October 1975, Page 14

Word Count
204

The Groups Show Press, Volume CXV, Issue 33977, 18 October 1975, Page 14

The Groups Show Press, Volume CXV, Issue 33977, 18 October 1975, Page 14