Accepted and rejected
Sir, — Freedom of the! press is essential in democratic society, but it! appears that your newspaper sir, also interprets this to. mean freedom to limit ex-: pression. “The Press” is no-; :torious among our larger dailies in that rules for cor-, respondents read like pej nances for admission to a monastic order. For example, you silence those; who for justifiable reasons! would be reluctant to be. identified under elec-! Pioneering letters. Controversial topics are often gagged prematurely so that! in-depth measures of the arguments are prohibited.) .Letters published outside' 'your repressive domain are! unacceptable. Letters referring to items of importance; lin other media are forbidden' topics, and correspondents; are often redirected to alter-; native channels. The more; liberal attitude of leading; ■ northern dailies would enlighten the enforced ignor-; ance of many local sub-; scribers. Your reactions arejt awaited with interest pend-'i ing detailed complaints toic the New Zealand Press, f
I Council and Avalon. —j 'Yours, etc., REPRESSED. I September 23, 1975. [The rules for letters to the editor are framed for the guidance of letter-; writers —primarily in the; interests of readers.' “Freedom” for every correspondent would cur-, tail the space for news; in the paper; in the 24 i hours after receipt of' . “Repressed’s” letter, 33; letters were submitted to; the editor for publication in “The Press.” Of these,! 9 are printed in this! ; issue, six have been accepted for publication; in later issues, four have! been held over to be re-1 ferred to various authori-i ties for comment, and 14 have not been accepted for publication. Of the! “rejects” (acknow-' ledged at the top of this, column), four exceeded! 150 words. Many news-; papers accept for publi-| cation no letters over a pen-name; some insist j on printing each corres-i pondent’s address; most make no acknowledgement of rejected letters.! - In the week ended September 20, “The Press”; printed 69 letters (apart; from letters on television ! programmes and letters incorporated in news items), compared with 54 in the. “New Zealand! Herald,” 34 in the; “Auckland Star,” 78 in the “Dominion,” 76 in] the “Evening Post.” and; 59 in the “Christchurch; Star.”—Editor]
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19750927.2.105.3
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume CXV, Issue 33959, 27 September 1975, Page 14
Word Count
356Accepted and rejected Press, Volume CXV, Issue 33959, 27 September 1975, Page 14
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.