LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CXIII, Issue 33189, 31 March 1973, Page 14

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

1(1) Letters to be considered for this column must not exceed 150 words They should be on only one side of the i paper; preferably typewritten otherwise clearly writ ten in ink; and ample margins and space between lines should be left for con venience in sub-editing. (2) A legible signature and full address—not a P.O box number — are required whether these are to be printed or not (3) The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere (4) The editor cannot return oi keep any letter not accepted for printing; nor does he undertake to acknowledge or enter into correspondence concerning tetters, although an acknowledgment will be made where this seems to be necessarv or helpful (5) As a genera) rule, correspondence on news items in other publications, or carried on radio and television, is not acceptable. Tom Hay—Not just now. O. W. Drain.—Seeking comment. Peter Allan.—Sectional interest only. I Toby Belch.—Well keep it in | mind. A. B. Cedarian.—Stick to the subject. M. O’Neill.—(a) Too late. (b) Too long. I Anti-Fire.—Signature illegible, letter too long. C.D and others.—Correspondence on “Demonstrators and the police” now closed. E. T. Rea. —They can accept universal superannuation instead of the old age benefits. Mark D. Sadler.—But it is precisely the system of fiscal exchange rates which “serves the interests of currency speculators.” J. F. Williams.—New Zealand’s relations with those States —not the nature of those States —are the subject of the correspondence. G. W. S. Chisnall.—Wool acquisL lion fully discussed in these columns some time ago. Spokesmen for the various interests have access to our news columns.