LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CXIII, Issue 33147, 10 February 1973, Page 14

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

ill Letters to be considered tor|( this column must not exceed 150 words. They should), be on only one side of thei( paper; preferably typewrit- If ten otherwise clearly written in ink: and ample J margins and space between X lines should be left Tor con if vemence in sub-editing , 2) A legible signature and full address—not a P.O. box, number — are required whether these are to be ' printed or not 1(3) The correspondent must , sav whether the letter has been or is to be submitted C elsewhere 1 (4) The editor cannot return or ( keep any letter not accepted t for printing; nor does he undertake to acknowledge or I enter into correspondence 1 concerning letters, although t an acknowledgment will be made where this seems to be 1 necessary or helpful t (5) As a genera] rule, corres- r pondence on news items in j other publications, or carried . on radio and television, is 1 not acceptable. C r t Somerfield.—Barely relevant. t B. Sensible.-B. brief. C Food for Thought.—Unduly ex- ? tends the subject. ij A Dreamer, John Citizen.—Not I c helpful. | a Eye for an Eye.—The argument c is about which players can legally be considered for d selection. f Adam and Eve.—A matter, X surely, for the parents, staff, \ and parent-teacher associa- . tion to settle. i Handicapped.—Too long for pubheation; but you might C interest the owners’ and 1 breeders’ association in your ( cause. i Curious.—Section 60 of the Municipal Corporations Act, 1954, '■ reads as follows: “If any can- I didate consents to be nomin- j ated for more than one ward at anv election in a divided borough, his nomination f shall in every case be void.” j X ’s