Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Viewers’ Views

Letters on television topics are subject to the rules applying to general correspondence. “Coronation Street” As three coyly anonymous critics of mine have themselves “rushed into print” may I answer them—politely? Like “New Zealander” I too enjoy New Zealand programmes, but in light entertainment there are too few

of them as yet, and there- i fore the N.Z.B.C. must, pre- i sumably, have to draw on i other countries for plays, i etc. “N.Z.B.C. Fan” is absurd 1 in suggesting that I am either i intolerant or abusive. I just I said that I liked “Coronation ■ Street” myself for the rea- 1 sons I mentioned. To “C.1.M.” i I would reply that “pawky” •

means “drily”—with a dash of slyness—and it is precisely the term I would use to describe New Zealand humour. All these people exhibit prejudice if not hostility against a country from which they derive their language, their judiciary and many of their habits. Why? —I. TREW.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19720928.2.38.3

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXII, Issue 33033, 28 September 1972, Page 4

Word Count
161

Viewers’ Views Press, Volume CXII, Issue 33033, 28 September 1972, Page 4

Viewers’ Views Press, Volume CXII, Issue 33033, 28 September 1972, Page 4