LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CXII, Issue 33032, 27 September 1972, Page 14

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1> Letters to be considered for this column must not exceed 150 words. They should be on only one side of the raper; preferably typewriten otherwise clearly written in ink: and ample margins and space between tines should be left for convenience in sub-editing. (21 A legible signature and full address—not a P.O. box number — are required whether these are to be printed or not <3l The correspondent must say whether the tetter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere <4> The editor cannot return or keep any letter not accepted for printing: nor does he undertake to acknowledge or enter into correspondence concerning letters although an acknowledgment will be made where this seems to be necessary or helpful <5» As a general rule, correspondence on news items in other publications, or carried on radio and television, is not acceptable. M. Susskind.—Thank you; your views noted. Mrs M. Brown.—Subject not now open. T. M. C. Pinfold.—Yon do not observe our rules, set out above. “P. E. Granite.”—Nonsense; we print similar criticisms regularly. Interested Onlooker.—Signature illegible; and we have space for only one critic. Who’s Who.—The subject is woo! marketing. Your general complaints could be aired during the election campaign. M. J. Egan.—You offer no evidence in support of your assertions; "apparently” is not proof. M. O’Neill.—lt is their opinion; buyers can form their own. See news item on Deedee printed on Saturday’s cable page.