Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

THE BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION has sent to nearly 5000 former employees this set of three mint stamps issued by the British Post Office to mark the corporation’s fiftieth anniversary. The B.B.C. has a staff of 23,000 and, because of the large number of former employees scattered round the world, it has not been possible to arrange a reunion in London. In a covering letter the B.B.C. thanks former staff for their contribution to the corporation’s growth and says that it thinks of all of them “as still members of the old firm.”

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19720927.2.137

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CXII, Issue 33032, 27 September 1972, Page 17

Word Count
92

THE BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION has sent to nearly 5000 former employees this set of three mint stamps issued by the British Post Office to mark the corporation’s fiftieth anniversary. The B.B.C. has a staff of 23,000 and, because of the large number of former employees scattered round the world, it has not been possible to arrange a reunion in London. In a covering letter the B.B.C. thanks former staff for their contribution to the corporation’s growth and says that it thinks of all of them “as still members of the old firm.” Press, Volume CXII, Issue 33032, 27 September 1972, Page 17

THE BRITISH BROADCASTING CORPORATION has sent to nearly 5000 former employees this set of three mint stamps issued by the British Post Office to mark the corporation’s fiftieth anniversary. The B.B.C. has a staff of 23,000 and, because of the large number of former employees scattered round the world, it has not been possible to arrange a reunion in London. In a covering letter the B.B.C. thanks former staff for their contribution to the corporation’s growth and says that it thinks of all of them “as still members of the old firm.” Press, Volume CXII, Issue 33032, 27 September 1972, Page 17