LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32676, 4 August 1971, Page 16

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

<l> Letters to be considered for this column must not exceed ISO words. They should be on only one side of the paper; preferably typewrit, ten, otherwise clearly writ- ♦ ml* in ink; and ample margins and space between lines should be left for convenience In subediting. (2) A legible signature and full address—not a P.O. box number are required whether these are to be printed or not (3) The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere. <4> The editor cannot return or keep any letter not accepted for printing; nor does he undertake to acknowledge or enter into correspondence concerning letters, although an acknowledgement will be made where this seems to be necessary or helpful. <5l As a general rule, correspondence on news Items, tn other publications, or carried on radio and television. Is not acceptable. Cantabrian.—Not here. I.N.W.—We are inquiring. W. J. W. Terry.—We have space for only one critic. A Student.— Correspondence on demonstrations is: not being reopened just now. Jovinlan.—We are not admitting yet another discussion of demonstrations. G. L. Manson.—Too long. Bee rules above. Romans 13.—N0 space to discuss Biblical prophecy. C. J. B.—Any consideration we might give your letter would be helped by your explaining the occasion for it A. D. Mcßobie.—Nevertheless your -letter would have reopened the one subject and opened the other. You should have ample opportunity for questioning Mr Rich’s statements when the Local Government Commission’s proposals are pub Ushed.