A.A. disappointed by Ministry reply

Press, Volume CXI, Issue 32542, 27 February 1971, Page 9

A.A. disappointed by Ministry reply

Disappointment at the “negative and unacceptable” reply given by the Ministry of Transport to suggestions on car signalling devices had been expressed by the national motoring and traffic committee of the Automobile Association (Canterbury) council, the council was told on Thursday evening.

The suggestion had been that all vehicles first registered after January 1, 1951,

be fitted with approved signalling devices, and that it be mandatory to signal all turns at all times, the committee reported. The Ministry had replied that "having regard to all the circumstances, there is insufficient evidence to justify the compulsory fitting of direction indicators to those older vehicles not so equipped," and that “as new vehicles are put into service and older ones withdrawn the position will progressively care for itself.”' ■ The committee had expressed disappointment and resolved the A.A.C. council be advised of its feelings, the report said. Presenting the report, the committee chairman (Mr J. R. Mating) said some other reasons for “knocking back” the suggestion had been given by the Ministry were “even less worthy” than those quoted. The matter would be taken further. Staff Directive

A memorandum from the general manager (Mr E. S. Palliser) to the association’s service and technical officers was attached to the report. In it, Mr Palliser asked officers to ensure they signalled all turns at all times when driving. He also said that the 1970 conference of New Zealand automobile associations had asked for signals on all vehicles, and for them to be used at all times.

The Canterbury association felt such requirements could not do other than lead to improvements in traffic flow and road safety, he said.