LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

Press, Volume CX, Issue 32391, 2 September 1970, Page 16

LETTERS TO THE EDITOR

(1) Letters to bo considered tor this column must not exceed ISO words. They should be on only one side of the paper; preferably typewrit ten. otherwise clearly written in Ink: and ample margins and space between lines should be left for con venience In sub editing. <2> A legible signature and full address —not a P.O box number are required whether these are to be printed or not. <3> The correspondent must say whether the letter has been or is to be submitted elsewhere (4) The editor cannot return or keep any letter not aceep ted for printing; nor does he undertake to acknow ledge or enter Into corres pondence concerning letters, although an acknowledge ment will be made where this seems to be necessary or helpful <S) As a general rule corres pondence on news items In other publications. or carried on radio and tele vision, is not acceptable

R. Davis.—lnteresting, even amusing; but not constitutionally significant. M. O'Neill. Not complete silence. You overlook our article on June 25. However. we’ll inquire again. D. Phipson.—Your guess, or information, on a 1 per cent oiler is not correct; the issue that precipitated the civil aviation stoppage was weeks, not years, old: we have no evidence tb Show that- the teachers' claims will not be dealt with fairly. Have you’