Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

Publications Tribunal

Sir, —I do not think pornography is likely to harm any reader, but standards of "ood taste—not arbitrary, but socially determined—should be maintained. There is a conventional and legal limit to obscenity expressed in public, and four-letter words or

biological details add nothing either to the reality or the literary merit of a book. The tribunal and its supporters confuse the licence of filth with personal liberty; censorship itself has become a dirty word because in other lands it means the black-out of ideas and political witchhunting.—Yours, etc., VARIAN J. WILSON. August 31, 1967.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19670901.2.86.2

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31463, 1 September 1967, Page 12

Word Count
96

Publications Tribunal Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31463, 1 September 1967, Page 12

Publications Tribunal Press, Volume CVII, Issue 31463, 1 September 1967, Page 12