Article image
Article image
Article image
Article image

PRIORITY ROADS

Signs Not Favoured The expense of erecting traffic signs to denote priority routes was not warranted, said the Commissioner of Transport (Mr R .J. Poiaschek). This was reported to the/council of the Automobile Association (Canterbury) on Thursday evening. The council, through the New Zealand Automobile Association, had put the case for such signs to Mr Polaschek. Mr Polaschek replied that the backs of “stop” and “give way” signs were painted to indicate their nature to motorists on the main road. The observance of “stop” and “give way” signs was not perfect, and there would always be drivers who would forget the signs or whose attention would be distracted. It was therefore wise for all motorists on main roads to drive defensively in ease a Side-road driver failed to stop or give way. The proposed signs would help drivers on unfamiliar roads, but he was concerned that they might increase the possibility of accidents by reducing the attention mainroad drivers paid to side streets, and by increasing the speed of main road traffic. The council received the letter.

This article text was automatically generated and may include errors. View the full page to see article in its original form.
Permanent link to this item

https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19670401.2.240

Bibliographic details

Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31333, 1 April 1967, Page 20

Word Count
179

PRIORITY ROADS Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31333, 1 April 1967, Page 20

PRIORITY ROADS Press, Volume CVI, Issue 31333, 1 April 1967, Page 20