Policy On Salk Vaccine Attacked
(New Zealand Press Association) HAMILTON, August 30. If it did not ensure that the salk polio vaccine was available to private doctors, the Health Department would be to blame for the return of poliomyelitis to New Zealand, said Dr. R. B. Tennent, of Ngatea, in a letter in the August issue of the “New Zealand Medical Journal.”
“The time has come when suitably equipped doctors, especially in the country, should have Salk vaccine made available to them,” Dr. Tennent said. “To say we are not equipped to run clinics is insulting. At the present time patients in this district have to go up to 25 miles to protect their children. “If something is not done, the Department of Health will be to blame for the return of poliomyelitis to this country. “In my opinion, it is failing in its job through shortsighted obstinacy and lack of faith in general practitioners.” Dr. Tennent said a check on all babies delivered by
him and his partners in 1964 showed a disturbing situation. “Of the 124 deliveries in this practice, 94 were traced,” he said. “This may seem a high attrition, but in a dairying district, there is a big annual change of population. “Of these 94, we had immunised 92 against diptheria, pertussis and tetanus. The district nurse had done one, and one was not immunised. “However, only 76 had taken their babies for Salk vaccine, in spite of being told to do so. The failure rate broke down as follows:
Pakeha 14.8 per cent, Maori, 63.5 per cent ,over-all 19 per
cent “Furthermore, the failures were, as one would expect, mostly from the less well-to-do home—just those most likely to get disease of this type,” Dr. Tennent said.
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19650831.2.195
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30843, 31 August 1965, Page 14
Word Count
292Policy On Salk Vaccine Attacked Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30843, 31 August 1965, Page 14
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.