DECISION ON SIGNS
Revision By S.M.
IIV.Z. Press Association)
AUCKLAND, August 6.
Mr M. C. Astley, S.M., said today that since delivering his decision that the Auckland City Council had no power to erect “no-standing” signs, his attention had been drawn to amendment No. 9 of the Traffic Regulations, 1956, which he had not sighted—whereby the principal regulation was amended by authorising the words “nostanding” on a sign of class G.
“Consequently, my finding that there was no designed alternative sign to ‘no stopping’, as was originally prescribed by the regulations, is erroneous and all reference thereto should be deleted from my decision,” he said.
“In my finding, while the regulations now appear to be adequate to authorise the sign ‘no-standing’ as used in the city, the Transport Act, 1962, still requires the amendment to section 72 (K) to validate those regulations by including the word ‘standing’ in that sub-clause.”
Permanent link to this item
https://paperspast.natlib.govt.nz/newspapers/CHP19650807.2.5
Bibliographic details
Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30823, 7 August 1965, Page 1
Word Count
150DECISION ON SIGNS Press, Volume CIV, Issue 30823, 7 August 1965, Page 1
Using This Item
Stuff Ltd is the copyright owner for the Press. You can reproduce in-copyright material from this newspaper for non-commercial use under a Creative Commons BY-NC-SA 3.0 New Zealand licence. This newspaper is not available for commercial use without the consent of Stuff Ltd. For advice on reproduction of out-of-copyright material from this newspaper, please refer to the Copyright guide.
Acknowledgements
This newspaper was digitised in partnership with Christchurch City Libraries.